Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Keuangan dan Kebijakan Publik (JEKKP) memuat tulisan berdasarkan kajian konsetual dan hasil penelitian di bidang Keuangan dan Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal ini terbit dua kali dalam setahun, yaitu di bulan Juli dan Desember

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Setelah mengajukan naskah maka editor JEKKP akan meninjau awal naskah. Editor akan memutuskan apakah naskah sesuai dengan fokus dan ruang lingkup serta layak untuk di berikan ke reviewer. Editor juga memeriksa naskah apakah plagiasi tinggi atau tidak. Editor dapat memuruskan revisi sebelum mengirimkan naskah ke reviewer. Peninjauan awal ini biasanya membutuhkan waktu satu minggu.

Naskah yang telah lulus tinjauan awal kemudian akan diteruskan kepada editor bagian untuk kemudian editor bagian menugaskan satu reviewer dengan menggunakan metode (double-blind peer review).

Ada lima kemungkinan keputusan editorial dan reviewer

Naskah diterima
Naskah di revisi atau di perbaiki
Naskah dikirim ulang
Naskah sebaiknya dikirimkan ke penerbit lain
Nashkah ditolak
Biasanya jangka waktu pengiriman hasil ke editor pertama membutuhkan waktu sekitar 2-3 minggu.

Waktu untuk mencapai keputusan akhir tergantung jumlah round atau putaran apakah naskah di revisi atau di terima. Biasanya membutuhkan waktu 4 sampai 5 bulan untuk keputusan akhir sebelum penerbitan.

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Bisnis (JRMB) terbit dua kali dalam setahun, yaitu di bulan Juli dan Desember.

 

Open Access Policy

Isi jurnal ini memberi akses terbuka secara langsung dan bebas kepada publik dengan asas  penelitian guna mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan secara global

 

Publication Ethics

JEKKP adheres to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines that ensures a high-quality standard of ethics for authors, editors, and reviewers:

Authors

  1. Authors attest that the material has not been previously published and that they have not transferred any rights to the article to another party.
  2. Authors should ensure the originality of their work and must properly cite others work in accordance with the approved references format.
  3. Authors should not engage in plagiarism or self-plagiarism.
  4. Authors should make all data and details of their work available to the editors if there are suspicions of data falsification or fabrication.
  5. Authors of the article should declare any possible conflicts of interest such as their job role, research expenses, consultant expenses, and intellectual property.

Editors

  1. Editors are responsible for every article published in JEKKP.
  2. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers when making final decisions regarding publication.
  3. An editor must evaluate manuscripts objectively for publication; judging each on its merit without bias towards nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the authors. Editors should decline articles if there is a potential conflict of interest.
  4. Editors must ensure that documents sent to reviewers do not contain private information of the authors and vice versa.
  5. The editor's final decision should be relayed to authors in a timely fashion and will be accompanied by the reviewer's comments, unless they contain offensive or libelous remarks.
  6. If authors have a well-reasoned objection to a certain individual reviewing their work, editors should respect this request.
  7. Editors and all staff should guarantee the confidentiality of the submitted manuscript.
  8. Editors will be guided by the COPE guidelines if there is a suspected misconduct or disputed authorship.

Reviewers

  1. Reviewers are required to comment on possible research, ethical, and publication misconduct if they are suspected.
  2. Reviewers must complete the work in a timely manner and should notify the editor immediately if they cannot complete the work.
  3. Reviewers are to respect the confidentiality of the manuscript.

Reviewers should not accept manuscripts for assessment if they believe there is a potential conflict of interest between them and any of the authors.