PENGARUH KEMAMPUAN KERJA, BUDAYA ORGANISASI, IKLIM ORGANISASI DAN LOYALITAS TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA KANTOR PELAYANAN PAJAK PRATAMA MEDAN BARAT

Desni Lubis

Abstract


There is a significant influence between the ability to work the performance of employees, because according to the results of analysis Thitung > T-table (2.966 > 1.67) at n = 96 with the level of Sifgifikansi 95%. There is a significant influence between organizational culture to employee performance, results of Thitung > T-Table analysis (3.220 > 1.67) at n = 96 with the level of Sifgnifikansi 95%. There is a significant influence between the organizational climate to the employees ' performance, because according to the results of the analysis Thitung > T-table (1.984 > 1.67) at n = 96 with a level of equal 95%. There is a significant influence between loyalty to employee performance, because according to the results of analysis Thitung > T-table (8.893 > 1.67) at n = 96 with the level of exposure to 95%. The value F-count > F table (87,303 > 2.46) with DK pemator 4 and DK Denominator 91 together (multiple) there are positive influence and significant work ability, organizational culture, climate organization Andloyalty to the performance of office employees West Medan Primary Tax service. Thus a proposed hypothesis was received.

Keywords


Work ability, organizational culture, organizational climate, loyalty and employee performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alwi, (2011) Amirullah, danHanafi, Rindyah. 2002. PengantarManajemen. Yogyakarta :Graha Ilmu.

Anoraga, Panji. 2013. PsiklogiKerja. Jakarta : PT. RinekaCipta.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta : PT. Rhineka. Cipta.

Bafadal, Ibrahim. 2013. PeningkatanProfesionalismePegawaiInstansiDasar. Jakarta. PT. RinekaCipta

Bandura, Albert & Locke, Edwin. A. (2003).Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited.Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 88, No. 1, 87-99

Benardi, Ressel (2001), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, PT. Preshelindo, Jakarta.

Dessler, G. 2. (2008). Human Resource Management 11th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall

Danim, Sudarman. 2003. Agenda PembaharuanSistemInstansi. Jakarta :PustakaBekerja.

Depdikbud. 2010. KamusBesar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta :BalaiPustaka.

Fattah, Nanang. 2003. LandasanKeinstansi. Bandung : PT. RemajaRodaskarya.

Flippo, 2016. Gardener, Howard. 2014. TeoriInteligensiGandadanAplikasinya Di Instansi. Yogyakarta :Kanisius.

Garis-garisBesar Program Instansidan Pelatihan Produktif. 2009. Jakarta. Departemen Instansi dan Kebudayaan.

Handoko. T. Hani, 2014 :Manajemen, Yogyakarta : BPFE.

Hasibuan, Melayu SP. 2013. OrganisasidanMotivasi. Jakarta : PT. BumiAksara.

JudgedanBono,2010,“Five-FactorModelofPersonalityandTransformational Leadership”, Journal of Applied Psychology..

Kreitner, Robert; danKinicki, Angelo, 2015,” Perilaku Organisasi”, Buku 1, Edisi Kelima, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Mathis, Robert L dan Jackson, Jhon H. 2002. Manajemen SDM. Jakarta :SalembaEmpat.

Sadarmayanti. 2001. SDM dan ProduktivitasKerja, Bandung :Mandar Maju.

Siagian, S.P,2010 : Organisasi, Kepemimpinan dan Prilaku Organisasi, Gunung Agung, Jakarta

Soekartawi. 2005. MeningkatkanEfektivitas .Jakarta : PT DuniaPustaka Jaya.

TjiptonoFandy, danSyakhroza, (2010), KepemimpinanTransformasionalManajemendanUsahawan Indonesia, Jakarta, Jurnal.

TrigunoSutarto (2010) Dasar-Dasar Organisasi, Gajah Mada University Press : Yogyakarta.

Toulsondan Smith (2014:457) mendefinisikaniklimorganisasisebagai

Uzer, Moh Usman. 2015. MenjadiPegawaiProfesional. Bandung : PT RemajaRosdakarya.

Winardi. 2002.MotivasidanPermotivasianDalamManajemen. Jakarta : PT Raja GrafindoPersada.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/akutansi.v7i1.2720

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JRAM (Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Multiparadigma)
Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Jl. Sisingamangaraja, Teladan-Medan Indonesia 20217 
Telp. (061) 7869880 | fax. (061) 7869880
Email: admin.jram@fe.uisu.ac.id