Literature Review: Multiparadigm Accounting Research

Danny Ivan Rantung, Nouke Sysca Oroh, Ika Prayanthi

Abstract


The objective of this paper is to explore all related literature with multiparadigm accounting research approaches. The literature search strategy begins by looking at literature from sources in the forms of books or sources originating from several databases or search engines including open knowledge maps, google scholar, and z-library. The keywords used for the search are “accounting: science with various paradigms, multiparadigm accounting research, accounting paradigm and paradigm accounting”.  From the results of searching and reviewing the literature, including books, journal articles and other electronic sources, various kinds of multiparadigm accounting research were obtained. By knowing the benefits of each of the paradigm viewpoints that have been described, it is good if we take a mixed paradigm approach in accounting research so that research results are of higher quality because they are not only based on one paradigm. Even though in one research using one accounting paradigm, those of us who strongly believe in a certain paradigm still have an open mind towards other paradigms thus enriching our views so that in studying accounting all paradigms are believed to complement one another. This research will greatly contribute to academics in viewing accounting from various perspectives. This literature review classifies multiparadigm accounting research based on more specific groups.


Keywords


multiparadigm accounting

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amirya, M., Djamhuri, A., & Ludigdo, U. (2012). Pengembangan sistem anggaran dan akuntansi badan layanan umum Universitas Brawijaya: Perspektif institusionalis. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 3(3), 334-501.

Andajani, A. R. (2021). Logical fallacy dalam riset akuntansi positivisme. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 12(3), 467-486.

Belkaoui, A. (2007). Teori Akuntansi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Birnberg, G. J., & Shields, J. F. (1989). Three decades of behavioral accounting research: A search for order. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1(1), 23-74.

Brierly, J. (2017). The role of a pragmatist paradigm when adopting mixed methods in behavioural accounting research. International Journal Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 6(2), 140-154.

Briers, M., & Hirst, M. (1990). The role of budgetary information in performance evaluation. Readings in Accounting for Management Control, 15(4), 232-265.

Burrel, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. London: Heineman.

Chua, W. F. (1986, October). Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review, 601-632.

Cooper, D. J., Hayes, D., & Wolf, F. (1981). Accounting in organized anarchies: Understanding and designing accounting systems in ambiguous situasions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6(3), 175-191.

Dillard, J. F., & Becker, D. A. (1997). Organizational Sociology and Accounting Research on Understanding Accounting in Organization Using Sociology. (B. A. Frontiers, Ed.)

Efferin, S. (2015). Akuntansi, spiritualitas dan kearifan lokal: beberapa agenda penelitian kritis. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 6(3), 466-480. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2015.12.6037

Espa, V. (2014). Formulasi proses belajar mengajar akuntansi multiparadigma dengan pendekatan hypnoteaching. Jurnal Audit dan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Tanjungpura, 3(2), 85-122.

Fox, J., Dennis, S., & Osth, A. F. (2020). Accounting for the build-up of proactive interference across lists in a list length paradigm reveals a dominance of item-noise in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 110(1), 1-21.

Fraser, K. (2015). Position paper: Defeating the paradigm wars in accounting: A mixed methods approach is needed in the education of PhD scholars. International Journal of Multiple Resarch Approaches, 8(1), 49-62.

Govindarajan, V. (2009). Management control system. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Ikhsan, A. (2008). Teori Akuntansi & Riset Multiparadigma. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Izzalqurny, T. R., & Nabila, F. (2021). Apakah paradigma nonpositivisme (interpetif, kritis, dan posmodernis) dalam akuntansi ilmiah? Media Akuntansi Universitas Muhammadiya Semarang, 11(1), 13-26.

Jeanjean, T., & Ramirez, C. (2014). Back to the origins of positive theories: a contribution to an analysis of paradigm changes in accounting research. Accounting in Europe, 6(1), 107-126.

Jurana, Yamin, N. Y., & Indriasar, R. (2019). Interpretivisme: Sebuah perspektif yang digunakan dalam pengembangan ilmu akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Syariah, 2(1), 1-20.

Kamayanti, A. (2018). Meredefinisi akuntansi keperilakuan melalui perspektif multiparadigma. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Akuntansi, Manajemen, dan Keuangan ke III (pp. 1-12). Malang: Jurusan Akuntansi Politeknik Negeri Malang.

Kaplan, R. S. (1984). The evolution of management accounting. Readings in Accounting for Management Control, 586-621.

Lubis, I. (2021). Implementasi paradigma integratif interkonektif dalam pembelajaran akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan, 4(2), 1-9.

Macintosh, B., Norman, & Scapens, R. W. (1990). Structuration theory in management accounting. Accounting, Organization and Society, 15(1), 455-477.

Malmi, T. (2010). Reflection on paradigms in action in accounting research. Management Accounting Research, 21(1), 121-123.

Musmini, L. S., & Sirajudin. (2016). Makna akuntansi sosial dan sustainabilitas sekaa suka duka. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 7(2), 156-323.

Neesham, C., McCormick, L., & Greenwood, M. (2017). When paradigms meet: interacting perspectives on evaluation in the non-profit sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 33(2), 1-28.

Pratama, B. B., Eltivia, N., & Ekasari, K. (2021). Revolusi akuntan 4.0. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 12(3), 547-564.

Salampessy, Z. (2021). Pendidikan akuntansi multiparadigma: belajar diri menuju akuntansi pancasila. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi Vokasi (pp. 1-16). Ambon: Politeknik Negeri Ambon.

Setiawan, A. R. (2011). Tinjauan paradigma penelitian: merayakan keragaman pengembangan ilmu akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 2(3), 369-540.

Siallagan, H. (2020). Teori Akuntansi. Medan: LPPM UHN Press.

Taye, F. A., Vedel, S. E., & Jacobsen, J. B. (2018). Accounting for enironmental atttitude to explain variations in willingness to pay for forest ecosystem services using the new environmental paradigm. Journal of Enivronmental Economics and Policy, 1-22.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/akutansi.v9i2.6599

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JRAM (Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Multiparadigma)
Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Jl. Sisingamangaraja, Teladan-Medan Indonesia 20217 
Telp. (061) 7869880 | fax. (061) 7869880
Email: admin.jram@fe.uisu.ac.id