Pencemaran Sampah Plastik Di Laut Berdasarkan Hukum Internasional

Abstract

Abstrak
Penelitian ini menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum dalam tindak pidana pencurian dengan kekerasan, berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 67/Pid.Sus.Anak/2024/PN.Mdn. Anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum menurut UU SPPA adalah individu berusia 12 hingga kurang dari 18 tahun yang belum menikah, baik sebagai pelaku, korban, maupun saksi tindak pidana, yang memerlukan perlakuan khusus sesuai prinsip perlindungan, pembinaan, dan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan studi kasus, menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, literatur hukum, dan wawancara praktisi hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan hakim mencerminkan upaya menyeimbangkan kepentingan penegakan hukum dan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak melalui penjatuhan pidana 1 tahun 6 bulan serta pembinaan di LPKA. Namun, hakim kurang mempertimbangkan pengulangan tindak pidana oleh anak sebagai faktor pemberat. Studi ini menekankan perlunya keseimbangan antara pembinaan, rehabilitasi, dan efek jera, sehingga pemidanaan anak tetap adil, melindungi hak anak, dan memberikan kepastian hukum bagi masyarakat.

Kata kunci: Perlindungan Anak, Peradilan Pidana Anak, Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan, UU SPPA, Anak Berkonflik Dengan Hukum

Abstrack
This study analyzes the legal protection of children in conflict with the law in the crime of theft with violence, based on Decision Number 67/Pid.Sus.Anak/2024/PN.Mdn. Children who are in conflict with the law according to the SPPA Law are individuals aged 12 to less than 18 years who are not married, either as perpetrators, victims, or witnesses to criminal acts, who require special treatment according to the principle of protection, development, and the best interests of the child. The research uses a normative juridical approach with case studies, examining laws and regulations, court decisions, legal literature, and interviews with legal practitioners. The results of the study show that the judge's decision reflects an effort to balance the interests of law enforcement and the best interests of children through the imposition of a sentence of 1 year and 6 months and coaching at LPKA. However, the judge did not consider the repetition of criminal acts by children as a mitigating factor. This study emphasizes the need to strike a balance between coaching, rehabilitation, and deterrent, so that juvenile punishment remains fair, protects children's rights, and provides legal certainty for society.

Keywords: Child Protection, Child Criminal Justice, Theft with Violence, SPPA Law, Children in Conflict with the Law