Tinjauan Yuridis Permohonan Pembatalan Terhadap Putusan (Bapmi) Badan Arbitrase Pasar Modal Indonesia Pada Pengadilan Negeri (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 958 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2018)

Abstract

Abstrak

Sebagaimana lembaga arbitrase, BAPMI memiliki putusan yang bersifat final and binding. Putusan yang dikeluarkan oleh lembaga arbitrase, yang dalam hal ini adalah BAPMI dalam studi kasus yang menjadi objek penelitian penulis, ternyata belum mampu memberi kepuasan bagi para pihak. Sehingga rumusan masalah yang ingin dibahas adalah tentang Bagaimana kekuatan hukum putusan BAPMI yang bersifat final and binding dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 958 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2018, alasan-alasan yang dapat digunakan untuk mengajukan pembatalan terhadap putusan BAPMI dan pertimbangan hukum Hakim dalam memutuskan sengketa pasar modal yang telah diputus BAPMI dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 958B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2018. Metode penelitian yang digunakan bersifat deskriptif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan mengkaji berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan (statue aproach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Hasil penelitian terhadap Kekuatan Hukum Putusan BAPMI yang Bersifat Final and Binding dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 958 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2018 bersifat final apabila para pihak dapat menerima dengan sukarela, tetapi juga dapat dimintakan pembatalan apabila salah satu pihak menduga bahwa Putusan BAPMI tersebut memenuhi unsur-unsur yang tercantum dalam Pasal 70 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Alasan-alasan Yang Dapat Digunakan untuk Mengajukan Pembatalan terhadap Putusan BAPMI diatur dalam beberapa peraturan seperti Pasal 643 Rv (Reglement op de Recthvordering), Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID) Pasal 52, Konvensi New York 1958 Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Rule, UNCITRAL Model Law dan terakhir adalah dalam Pasal 70 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Pertimbangan hukum Hakim dalam memutuskan sengketa pasar modal yang telah diputus BAPMI dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 958B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2018 bahwasanya majelis hakim menilai bahwa putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 198/Pdt.G-Arb/2018/PN Jkt.Sel telah tepat dan benar sehingga beralasan untuk dikuatkan.

Kata Kunci: BAPMI, Pembatalan, Pasar Modal, Putusan Nomor: 958 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2018  

Abstract

Like arbitration institutions, BAPMI has decisions that are final and binding. The decision issued by the arbitration institution, which in this case is BAPMI in the case study which is the object of the author's research, has apparently not been able to provide satisfaction to the parties. So the formulation of the problem to be discussed is about the legal force of BAPMI's decision which is final and binding in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 958 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2018, the reasons that can be used to request an annulment of BAPMI's decision and considerations Judge's law in deciding capital market disputes that have been decided by BAPMI in the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 958B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2018. The research method used is descriptive with a normative juridical approach by studying it based on statutory regulations and a case approach. The results of research on the Legal Strength of BAPMI Decisions which are Final and Binding in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 958 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2018 are final if the parties can accept them voluntarily, but can also be requested for cancellation if one of the parties suspects that BAPMI's decision fulfills the elements stated in Article 70 of Law Number 30 of 1999. The reasons that can be used to request an annulment of BAPMI's decision are regulated in several regulations such as Article 643 Rv (Regulation op de Recthvordering), Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID) Article 52, New York Convention 1958 Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Rule, UNCITRAL Model Law and finally in Article 70 Law Number 30 of 1999. Legal considerations The judge in deciding the capital market dispute that had been decided by BAPMI in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 958B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2018, the panel of judges considered that the decision of the South Jakarta District Court Number 198/Pdt.G-Arb/2018/PN Jkt. The cell is correct and correct so it has reason to be strengthened.

Keywords: BAPMI, Cancellation, Capital Markets, Decision Number: 958 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2018