The Speech Act Used By English Lecturer And Students in Blended Learning During New Normal Life

Berliana R Br Naipospos, Sulasmi Sulasmi, Herawati Br Bukit

Abstract


The transmission of COVID 19 has actually increased and become new cluster, namely Omicron has forced all sectors to demonstrate innovation including Education world, and one of the innovations is Blended Learning. Language as communication tool must be understood by speaker and interlocutor so that it doesn’t cause misunderstanding. If interlocutor and speaker both understand the meaning of speech conveyed, then information conveyed by speaker to interlocutor can work well. Phonetic understanding is not only literal meaning, but also implicit meaning. The study reasons are, firstly, it is concerned with classroom interaction analysis focusing on spoken language utilizing Pragmatic linguistic analysis about speech act used. Secondly, the classification and types of speech act, so it will find the speech act differences between online and face-to-face. This research was descriptive qualitative design by observing and recording conversations between English lecturers and pharmacy students during blended learning during new normal life as data collection techniques. Research results found the utterances in English lecturer and pharmacy students’ conversations are dominated by illocutionary act, which is as much as 65%. It showed that most of the speeches, both spoken by lecturers and students, are speeches that contain other meanings. The second rank was locutionary acts (20%). Finally, it is known that perlocutionary acts are the speech acts that appear the least, which is only 15% of all conversations. There are five illocutionary categories in face to face learning, namely assertive, directive, expressive, commissive, and declarative, while there is no declarative in online learning. It is known that in blended learning, the dominant classification of speech act used by English lecturer was directive which consist 32 lecturer's utterances as many as 54%. Whereas representative as dominant classification of speech act used by pharmacy students which consist 30 students’ utterances as many as 55%

Keywords


Pragmatic, Speech Act, Blended Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arevalo, Carmen Maiz. 2017. “Expressive Speech Acts in Educational e-chats”. De Gruyter. 5(2) : 151-178

BCC News, B. N. (2020). Kurikulum Darurat Covid-19 dan “Membuka Sekolah” di Zona Kuning, Kebijakan Terbaru Kemendikbud di Tengah Pandemi. BBC News Indonesia.

Brian Paltridge, Discourse Analysis,UK: Bloosbury Academic, 2012, second edition, p. 3 Djatmika. 2016. Mengenal Pragmatik yuk!?. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar

George Yule, The Study of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, fourth edition, 2014, p. 133

Gila A. Schauer, Interlanguage Pragmatic Development, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2016, p. 6, 7, 8

Idris, H. (2018). Pembelajaran Model Blended Learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Iqra’, 5(1), Vol. 5, No. 2, Desember 2020 M/1442 H

Kauts, A. & Kaur, G . (2014). Blended Learning: A Shift from Unimodal to Multimodal. University News, Vol.52, No.09

Koutchade, I. S. (2017).Analysing speech acts in buhari’s address at the 71st session of the UN general assembly. Australia: Australian International Academic Centre. Vol 6, No.3

Lalima, Kiran Lata Dangwal, “Blended Learning: An Inovative Approach”Universal Journal Of Educational Reserch. 2017

Laurence Horn and Gregory R. (ed.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, Oxford: Bleckwell Publishing, 2016, p. xi

Pravita Widya Darma, ”Expressive Speech Acts Used by English Teacher in Program Khusus (PK) Classes of The Eight Grade Students of MTsN Boyolali”, Thesis, IAIN Surakarta, Surakarta, 2018, p. xii, 21-22

Ronan, Patricia. 2015. “Categorizing Expressive Speech Acth in The Pragmatically Annotated SPICE Irealnd Corpus”. Icame Journal. Volume 39 – 0002

Searle, J. R. 2015. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Wardani, D. N., Toenlioe, A. J. E., & Wedi, A. (2018). Daya Tarik Pembelajaran Di Era 21 Blended Learning. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan (JKTP), 1(1), 13–18

Yonge, P. K. (2014). Blended Learning: Making it Work in Your Classroom.

Yule, George. 2014. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Yule, George. 2015. Kajian Bahasa. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/best.v5i2.6119

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

 

https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=kvKzX3QAAAAJ&hl=id&authuser=4

Best Journal (Biology Education, Sains and Technology)

Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, FKIP - Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Kampus Induk UISU Jl. Sisingamangaraja XII Teladan, Medan

Creative Commons License