A Comparative Study Of Using Cofe Switching And Code Mixing Method On Eleventh Grade Students’ Speaking Ability At SMK Tunas Pelita Binjai

Nudia Yultisa, Efrini Panjaitan, Muftia Salsabila, Maulidya Rahmah

Abstract


The aim of this research 1) to explore the type of each method that frequently used by the eleventh-grade students of SMK Tunas Pelita Binjai, 2) to identify which method is more often used by the eleventh-grade students of SMK Tunas Pelita Binjai. Data were analysed using descriptive qualitative methods. Data were obtained from speaking tests administered to students in group in front of the class. The types of code-switching, namely Tag-switching, Inter-sentential, and Intra-sentential, were analysed based on Appel and Muysken theory. As a result, students frequently used Intra-sentential type of code-switching at a rate of 72%, Inter-sentential at a rate of 40,4%, and finally used Tag-switching at a rate of 0%. Types of code-mixing, namely Insertion, Alternation and Congruent Lexicalization, were analysed based on Muysken theory. The results showed that 70,2% of the students frequently used the Insertion type of code-mixing, while the rate of the Alternation was 21,2%, and the rate of Congruent Lexicalization was 0%. Above all, the results showed the students used code-switching more frequently during the conversation test with total 112,4%, while the code-mixing showed the total 91,4%.


Keywords


Code Switching, Code Mixing, Speaking.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Appel, R., & Muysken, P. 2006. Language contact and bilingualism. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Creswell, John & Guetterman, Timothy. 2018. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 6th Edition. New York: Pearson.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman.

Holmes, J. 2001. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Muysken, P., Díaz, C. P., & Muysken, P. C. 2000. Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge University Press.

Nilep, C. 2010. "Code Switching" in Sociocultural Linguistics. Colorado Research in Linguistics.

Panjaitan, Efrini., et al. 2021. The Effect of Using Small Group Discussion Method on Students’ Ability in Reading Comprehension for the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Taman Siswa Binjai. Binjai: Jurnal Serunai Bahasa Inggris STKIP Budidaya Binjai.

Sugiyono. 2006. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta

Verplaetse, L.S., & Schmitt E. 2010. Bilingualism and Learning. Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Yuliana, N., et al. 2015. Code-Mixing and Code-Switching of Indonesian Celebrities: a Comparative Study. Jakarta Selatan.

Yultisa, Nudia & Ihsani Diah Anjariah. 2018. The Effect of Code Mixing Technique on Students’ Speaking Ability of Tenth Grade Students of SMK Tunas Pelita Binjai at Academic Year 2018/2019. English Education Department, STKIP Budidaya Binjai




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/best.v7i2.9744

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

 

https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=kvKzX3QAAAAJ&hl=id&authuser=4

Best Journal (Biology Education, Sains and Technology)

Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, FKIP - Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Kampus Induk UISU Jl. Sisingamangaraja XII Teladan, Medan

Creative Commons License