Analisis Yuridis Pembatalan Hak Untuk Melakukan Perkawinan Antara Sesama Pekerja Dalam Satu Perusahaan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 13/PUU-XV/2017)

Olivia Sitanggang

Abstract


Currently, there are several companies that make regulations that require the workers to resign or even be willing to be laid off if they decide to marry another worker in the company. Some of the reasons are preventing personal conflict, subjectivity, corruption, collusion and nepotism. The formulation of the problem in this research is what is the background of the provisions regarding the prohibition of marriage between fellow workers in one company, how is the analysis of the judges legal considerations in the decision Number 13 / PUU-XV / 2017, what is the impact of the Constitutional Court decision on the inclusion of clauses prohibiting intermarriage between workers.

The results showed that the background of the provisions concerning the prohibition of marriage between fellow workers in one company is to maintain a professional attitude of workers when carrying out their work in order to maintain the company's existence in the world of business competition. Another reason is that it refers to Article 153 paragraph (1) letter f of Law Number 13 of 2003 so that this provision is used as a reason for employers to prohibit marital ties for fellow workers in their company. The legal consideration of the judge in decision Number 13 / PUU-XV / 2017 is clear that Article 153 paragraph (1) letter f of the Labour Laws is no longer valid, because the phrase unless it has been regulated in a work agreement, company regulation, or collective working agreement is contrary to the Constitution 1945 and has no binding legal force. The impact of the Constitutional Court's decision on the inclusion of a clause on the prohibition of marriage is that employers cannot state the reasons for dismissal of workers who have marital ties to other workers in the same office in the employment agreements, company regulations or collective working agreements, so that if the entrepreneur includes it, it is considered to have violated the decision of the Constitutional Court.

Keywords: Cancellation of the Rights, Marriage, Workers, One Company.


Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Buku

Ali, Zainuddin. 2009. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Hernoko, Agus Yudha, 2008. Hukum Perjanjian Azas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial, LaksBang Mediatama, Yogyakarta, 2008

Ichsan, Achmad, 2006. Hukum Perkawinan Bagi Yang Beragama Islam, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 2006.

Kontjaraningrat, 1997. Metode-Metode Penelitian Masyarakat, Gramedia, Jakarta, 1997.

Manan. Abdul, 2003. Aneka Masalah Hukum Materil Dalam Praktek Peradilan Agama, Pustaka Bangsa Press, Jakarta, 2003.

Mukhtar, Kamal, 2013. Asas-Asas Hukum Islam Tentang Perkawinan, Bulan Bintang, Jakarta, 2013.

Sastroatmojo, Arso, 2008. Hukum Perkawinan, Bulan Bintang, Jakarta, 2008.

Soekanto, Soerjono, 2006.Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Pers, Jakarta, 2006.

Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo, 2004. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2004.

Soemiyati, 2012. Hukum Perkawinan Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2012.

Suratman, 2010. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia, Permata Puri Media, Jakarta, 2010.

B. Jurnal

Kapitan, Rian Van Frits, Kekuatan Mengikat Putusan Constitutional Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Mahkamah Agung, Jurnal MMH, Jilid 44 No. 4, Oktober 2015.

Novenanty, Wurianalya Maria, “Pembatasan Hak Untuk Menikah Antara Pekerja Dalam Satu Perusahaan,” http://journal.unpar.ac.id, diakses Sabtu 15 Juni 2019 Pukul 21.00 Wib.

Rohanawati, Ayunita Nur, Kesetaraan Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Dan Ambiguitas Pertimbangan Hukum Mahkamah Konstitusi, Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 13/PUU-XV/2017Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 11 No. 3 Desember 2018.

C. Internet

Siregar, Raja Adil, ”Halalkan Nikah Sekantor MK Selamatkan 4 Pegawai PLN dari PHK”, https://news.detik.com, diakses Sabtu 15 Juni 2019 Pukul 21.00 Wib.

Tashandra, Nabilla, Pasca Putusan MK Soal Nikah Antar Karyawan Se Kantor Perusahaan”, melalui https://nasional.kompas.com, diakses Senin 30 September 2019

D. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

UUD 1945 Hasil Amandemen dan ProsesAmandemen UUD 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan .

Undang-Undang RI Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan, L.N.R.I. Tahun 2003.

Kompilasi Hukum Islam.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v20i1.3256

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Olivia Sitanggang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat

Fakultas Hukum - Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Jl. Sisingamangaraja, Teladan, Medan 20217

Website: https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/jhk
Email: hukum_kaidah@fh.uisu.ac.id

Jurnal Kaidah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License