Analisa Yuridis Permohonan Pailit Atas Ketidakmampuan Pemenuhan Prestasi Perusahaan Yang Mengalami Force Majeure
Abstract
The bankruptcy petition filed by the creditor against the debtor who fails to perform the performance in force majeure conditions where the failure to implement the performance in a timely manner is considered as a debt that is due and billable by the creditor and the debtor who is petitioned for bankruptcy reasoned that the failure was caused by the force majeure conditions, as well as to find out the limits of the scope of force majeure, the proof of the inability to fulfill the achievements so that they are categorized as a debt that is due and billable, and the basis for the legal considerations in the cancellation of bankruptcy petitions submitted by the creditors.
This research uses normative juridical research, and the nature of the research is descriptive-analytical, and legislative research approach.
The absence of laws and regulations that comprehensively regulate the force majeure conditions lead to different interpretations. In considering the decision of the Commercial Court Number 53/Pailit/2012/PN.Niaga.JKT.PST and the verdict of the Supreme Court 835 K/Pdt.Sus/2012, it was decided that the demonstration was a force majeure that could not be predicted by the debtor. The force majeure condition as argued by the debtor does not include simple evidence as specified as one of the requirements in filing a bankruptcy petition, where the force majeure must be proven in a district court. The deelay in the implementation of the performance by the debtor cannot be categorized as a debt that is due and billable, because in the presence of the force majeure, the debtor is temporarily relieved of his obligations until the force majeure ends. However, the dissenting opinion of one of the member of the Supreme Court stated otherwise, that the demonstration could have been predicted by the debtor, so it could not be categorized as the force majeure, and therefore, the debtor had defaulted so that it was categorized as a debt that was due and collectible.
Keywords : Force Majeure, Dissenting Opinion, Due and Billable
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Buku
H.S, Salim. 2003. Hukum Kontrak: Teori dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. 2009. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. (Cet. ke-11). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Simanjuntak, Ricardo. 2005. Essensi Pembuktian Sederhana Dalam Kepailitan. Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Hukum
Subekti. 1985. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa
Syahdeini, Sutan Remy. 2016. Sejarah, Asas, Dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan, Memehami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepaiitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembyaran Utang, Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group
Yuhassarie, Emmy. 2005. Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Perkembangannya: Prosiding Rangkaian Lokakarya Terbatas Masalah-Masalah Kepailitan Dan Wawasan Hukum Bisnis Lainnya, Cet-2. Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Hukum
B. Undang-Undang
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004, Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
Undang-Undang No. 4 Tahun 1998, Tentang Kepailitan
C. Jurnal Ilmiah
Puang, Victorianus M.H Randa. 2006. Penerapan Asas Pembuktian Sederhana dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Pailit. Tesis. Medan: Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Sumatera Utara
Yulianny, Nenny. 2005. Kajian Penyelesaian Perkara Utang Piutang Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Pengertian Sumir Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1998 Tentang Kepailitan. Semarang: Tesis Program Pascasarjana Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Diponegoro
Setyowati, Peni Jati. 2021. Akibat Hukum Pandemi Covid-19 Sebagai Bencana Alam Non Medis dalam Menetapkan Force Majeure di Indonesia. Jurnal. Surabaya: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto Vol. 21 No. 1 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v21i2.4797
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Ulim Tjiatawi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat
Fakultas Hukum - Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Jl. Sisingamangaraja, Teladan, Medan 20217
Website: https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/jhk
Email: hukum_kaidah@fh.uisu.ac.id
Jurnal Kaidah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License