GUILT TRIPPING IN AGATHA CHRISTIE’S THE MURDER OF ROGER ACKROYD

Erika Widyani, Susi Ekalestari


Abstract


This study examines the use of guilt-tripping as a form of psychological manipulation in Agatha Christie’s The Murder of Roger Ackroyd. The analysis centers on identifying both the causes and the types of guilt-tripping enacted by the novel’s manipulative character. Employing McPhillips’ (2022) theoretical framework on manipulative behavior, the research adopts a descriptive qualitative approach, with a focus on character and narrative analysis. The findings reveal that the primary motivations for guilt-tripping include emotional dependency, a desire to manipulate and control others, and underlying feelings of low self-esteem and insecurity. In addition, two specific types of guilt-tripping behaviors are identified: love bombing and direct guilt inducement. These manipulative strategies are not only critical to the progression of the plot but also offer deeper insight into the psychological construction of the characters. The study contributes to the field of literary psychological criticism by illustrating how emotional manipulation is intricately embedded in the structure of detective fiction.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Baldassar, L. (2014). Guilty feelings and the guilt trip: Emotions and motivation in migration and transnational caregiving. Emotion, Space and Society, 16, 81–89.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to the theory and method. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Castello, M., & Monereo, C. (2005). Students’ note-taking as a knowledge construction tool. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 5(3), 265–285.

Christie, A. (2018). The murder of Roger Ackroyd. London, UK: Collins Crime Club.

Deck, E., Carducci, B. J., & Sime, T. (2017). Manipulation tactics: The role of love bombing and gaslighting in psychopathic intimate relationships. In Proceedings of the Forensic Psychology in Canada Conference. Ottawa, Canada.

Humeny, C. (2013). A qualitative investigation of a guilt trip. Institute of Cognitive Science Spring Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259189194_A_Qualitative_Investigation_of_a_Guilt_Trip

Leith, K., & Baumeister, R. (2008). Empathy, shame, guilt, and narratives of interpersonal conflict: Guilt-prone people are better at perspective taking. Journal of Personality, 66, 1–37.

Mandara, J., & Pikes, C. (2008). Guilt trips and love withdrawal: Does mother’s use of psychological control predict depressive symptoms among African American adolescents? Family Relations, 57, 602–612.

McPhillips, K. (2022). Someone can be a 'nice person' and still manipulate others—Here are 5 types of manipulative behavior. Well+Good. Retrieved May 23, 2022, from https://www.wellandgood.com/types-of-manipulative-behavior/

Rittenour, C. E., Kromka, S. M., Saunders, R. K., Davis, K., Garlitz, K., Opatz, S. N., Sutherland, A., & Thomas, M. (2019). Socializing the silent treatment: Parent and adult child communicated displeasure, identification, and satisfaction. Journal of Family Communication, 19(1), 77–93.

Scholz, U., Stadler, G., Berli, C., Lüscher, J., & Knoll, N. (2021). How do people experience and respond to social control from their partner? Three daily diary studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 621829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.621829

Sweet, P. L. (2019). The sociology of gaslighting. American Sociological Review, 84(5), 851–875.

Tangney, J. P. (1994). The mixed legacy of the superego: Adaptive and maladaptive aspects of shame and guilt. In J. M. Masling & R. F. Bornstein (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on object relations theory (pp. 1–28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11100-001




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/jol.v7i1.11042

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.