EXPLORING THE PROTAGONIST’S SUFFERING IN DENNIS BOCK’S THE ASH GARDEN

Tristi Ananda, Muhammad Fatih Suhadi

Abstract


This research explores the multidimensional suffering of the protagonist, Emiko Amai, in Dennis Bock’s novel The Ash Garden, using Quilao’s theoretical framework on human suffering. Through a descriptive qualitative approach, the study identifies five types of suffering—physical, psychological, social, existential, and ethical—as reflected in Emiko’s experiences before, during, and after the Hiroshima bombing. The analysis highlights how Emiko, as a war survivor, embodies the traumatic effects of violence, displacement, and physical disfigurement. Her journey reveals not only the pain and isolation endured in the aftermath of war but also the gradual process of resilience and self-redefinition. Emiko’s coping strategies—both physical and psychological—demonstrate how human beings attempt to restore meaning and identity in the face of profound loss. By situating her suffering within a literary and humanistic context, this study contributes to the discourse on trauma narratives and deepens the understanding of war-induced suffering in postmodern literature.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Asenahabi, B. M. (2019). Basics of research design: A guide to selecting appropriate research design. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 6(5), 78.

Ate, H. (1972). Iran literature history (Reza Zadeh Shafagh, Trans.). Tehran: Translation and Publication of Books.

Back, A. L., Rushton, C. H., Kaszniak, A. W., & Halifax, J. (2015). Why are we doing this? Clinician helplessness in the face of suffering. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 18(1), 26–30.

Barbara, J. S. (2006). Impact of war on children and imperative to end war. Croatian Medical Journal, 47, 891–894.

Bhattacharya, D. K. (2006). Research methodology. New Delhi: Excel Books.

Baumann, L. C., Dang, T. T., & Bae, H. (2013). Stories of suffering with leprosy and cancer in Korea. Nursing Science Quarterly, 26(3), 274–279.

Bock, D. (2001). The ash garden. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Boston, P., Bruce, A., & Schreiber, R. (2011). Existential suffering in the palliative care setting: An integrative literature review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41(3), 604–618.

Brown, G. (1995). The atomic bombing of Japan: Necessity or atrocity? Australia: Department of Parliamentary Library.

Cassell, E. J. (1991). Recognizing suffering. Hastings Center Report, 21(3), 24–31.

Cassell, E. J. (2004). The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Denckla, C. A., Consedine, N. S., & Bornstein, J. (2020). Psychological resilience: An update on definitions, a critical appraisal, recommendations. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 11. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1822064

Devik, S. A., Hellzen, O., Enmarker, I., & Sørbye, L. W. (2013). Meanings of being old, living on one’s own and suffering from incurable cancer in rural Norway. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 17, 776–783.

Frank, A. W. (2001). Can we research suffering? Qualitative Health Research, 11(3), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119154

Frankl, V. E. (1992). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. Boston: Beacon Press.

Hagedorn, S., & Quinn, A. A. (2014). Theory-based nurse practitioner practice: Caring in action. Topics in Advanced Practice Nursing, e-Journal, 4(4), 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.edscape.com/view.article/496718

Hakim, C. (2000). Research design: Successful designs in social and economic research. Abingdon: Routledge.

Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768

Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255–256.

Laughlin, M. T. (1989). Literature: The power of language. USA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

Lutters, E. (2006). Kunci sukses menulis skenario. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). The how of happiness. New York: The Penguin Press.

Meerwijk, E. L., & Weiss, S. J. (2011). Toward a unifying definition of psychological pain. Journal of Law and Trauma, 16(5), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2011.572044

Minderop, A. (2005). Metode karakterisasi telaah fiksi. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Mitchell, M. L., & Jolley, J. M. (2007). Research design explained (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Perrine, L., & Arp, T. (1998). Literature: Structure, sound, and sense. Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publisher.

Quilao, M. C. (2018). Human suffering: An integrative literature review. Revista Cultura del Cuidado, 15(2). ISSN: 1794-5232.

Raj, G. (1991). Dictionary of literary terms. New Delhi: Anmol.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.

Shaygan, M., & Jaberi, A. (2022). The experience of chronic pain among adolescents: Suffering and attempt to overcome pain. BMC Pediatrics, 22, 554.

Tate, T., & Pearlman, R. (2019). What we mean when we talk about suffering—and why Eric Cassell should not have the last word. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 62(1), 95–110.

Woods, A., Hart, A., Spandler, H., & Trenoweth, S. (2019). Mental illness, social suffering, and structural antagonism in the labour process. Work, Employment and Society, 33(6), 948–965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019866650




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/jol.v7i1.11073

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.