THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENT SOCIAL CLASSES IN LOUISA MAY ALCOTT’S NOVEL LITTLE WOMEN

Dinda Dwi Utami, Andang Suhendi

Abstract


This study examines how social class differences are portrayed and how they affect the protagonists in Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women. Using Marxist literary theory, the analysis focuses on class distinctions between the upper and lower classes and explores their implications for social behavior and personal identity. The qualitative descriptive method is applied to textual data gathered from close reading of the novel and relevant critical sources. The findings indicate that social class has significant impacts on the characters’ lives, manifested through experiences of bullying, jealousy, and internalized social inequality. The protagonists, particularly Meg and Amy March, face emotional conflict and social exclusion as consequences of their lower-class status. These experiences not only reveal structural injustices but also reflect broader capitalist social dynamics that define access to power, privilege, and self-worth. The study concludes that Little Women remains a valuable text for understanding how literature mirrors the enduring social hierarchies that shape human experience.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abcarian, R, Marvin, K. and Peter, R. (1998). Literature: Reading and writing the human experience. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press Inc.

Alcott, L.M. (1868). Little woman. Boston, MA: Qanita.

Barry, Peter. (1995). Beginning theory; An Introduction to literary and cultural theory. Manchester, England: Manchester United Press.

Creswell. J. W. (2003. Research design: Quantitative and mixed method approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Day, G. (2001). Class: The new critical idiom. London, England: Routledge

Doody, M. A. (1996). The true story of the novel. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Pres.

Dwipayana, G., Eko, S., & Wicaksono, A. (2003). Membangun good governance di desa. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Ire Press.

Gerard, S. (2001). The psychology and sociology of literature. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Horton, P. (1980). Social class effects. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Kerbo, H. (1996). Social stratification and inequality: Class conflict in historical and comparative perspective. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Litosseliti, L. (2010). Research methods in Linguistics. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1973). Manifesto of communist party. Moscow, Russia: Progress Publisher.

Saptono, Sulasmono, B. S., & Suteng, B. (2007). Sosiologi. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT. Phibeta Aneka Gama.

Semi, A. (1989). Kritik sastra. Bandung, Indonesia: Angkasa.

Wilczynski, J. (1984). Dictionary of marxism, socialism and communism. London, England: The Macmillan Press.

Woolf, V. (1882). Literary theory. London, England: David Carter.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/jol.v7i2.11997

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU)
Jln. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Barat Medan, Indonesia
Phone: +627869911  | e-mail: journal_language@sastra.uisu.ac.id