STUDENTS’ MASTERY OF SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE IN VERBAL SENTENCES: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY AT SMP BANDAR KLIPPA

Pandiwi Hasanah, M Manugeren

Abstract


This study explores students’ mastery of the simple present tense in verbal sentences, emphasizing their ability to construct positive, negative, and interrogative forms. The research was conducted at SMP Bandar Klippa, located in Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan, Kabupaten Deli Serdang, North Sumatra, during the 2023/2024 academic year. Employing a descriptive quantitative design, the study utilized an objective multiple-choice test as its primary instrument. A purposive sample of 23 students was selected from a population of 142. The findings indicate that students’ overall mastery of the simple present tense falls within the “fail” category, with a mean score of 49.56. Among the three forms assessed, Formula I (positive sentences) appeared as the most dominant, with a mean score of 0.52 or 37%. These results suggest that students struggle more with negative and interrogative sentence construction. Hence, adopting more contextualized and communicative grammar teaching methods is strongly recommended to enhance students’ grammatical accuracy and practical use of English in real-life communication.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Revised ed.). Jakarta, Indonesia: Rineka Cipta.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed., L. Fargotstein, Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. D. (1982). Language two. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Herlina, H., & Ramasari, M. (2018). Students’ ability in producing sentences of simple present tense at STMIK Musi Rawas. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 1(2), 154–167. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:65389454

McLendon, L. (2017). The perfect English grammar workbook: Simple rules and quizzes to master today’s English language. Berkeley, CA: Zephyros Press. https://doi.org/10.32520/eji.v3i1.466

Mulyaningrum, L. A. (2019). Students’ ability in making wh-questions: A descriptive study of the second-grade students of SMP Negeri 6 Purwokerto in academic year 2018/2019 (Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto). Retrieved from https://repository.ump.ac.id

Napratilora, M., & Siagian, S. Y. (2019). Tenses understanding in using the English language. EJI (English Journal of Indragiri): Studies in Education, Literature, and Linguistics, 3(1), 29–38.

Oviogun, P. V., & Veerdee, P. S. (2020). Definition of language and linguistics: Basic competence. Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics, 1(1), 1–12. Retrieved from https://mami.nyc/index.php/journal/article/download/1/37/36

Saengboon, S., Panyaatisin, K., & Toomaneejinda, A. (2022). The roles of grammar in English language teaching: Local viewpoints. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 63, 179–204. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov

Sudaryono, S. (2023). Metodologi penelitian: Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan mix method. Depok, Indonesia: Rajawali Press.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta.

Suhadi, J. (2016). Course in English structure. Medan, Indonesia: LPPM UISU Press.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2017). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Belajar.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/jol.v7i2.12002

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU)
Jln. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Barat Medan, Indonesia
Phone: +627869911  | e-mail: journal_language@sastra.uisu.ac.id