Rigid Social Structure of the Nineteenth-Century England in Jane Austen’s Novel Pride And Prejudice

Kesya Aprillia Balqis, M. Manugeren, Wan Anayati


Abstract


This study examines the rigid social structures of nineteenth-century England as depicted in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. The research investigates how inflexible social hierarchies, characterized by distinct class stratifications—upper, middle, and lower classes—constrained individual agency, particularly among women. The analysis focuses on four pivotal dimensions: marriage as a social transaction, social hierarchy and etiquette, land and wealth ownership, and the manifestations of prejudice and discrimination. Despite extensive scholarship on Austen's social critique, limited attention has been paid to the interaction between class stratification and individual agency within the specific context of nineteenth-century English property relations. Employing a Marxist literary framework, this research elucidates how material conditions fundamentally shaped character motivations, interpersonal dynamics, and socioeconomic opportunities. Through a qualitative analysis of dialogue, narration, and descriptive elements within the novel, the findings demonstrate how stringent social norms limited individual autonomy and engendered pervasive conflict between personal desires and societal imperatives. This study contributes to existing scholarship by revealing how Austen's narrative simultaneously critiques systemic inequality while exposing the psychological constraints imposed on middle-class women within a patriarchal property system. Ultimately, this study highlights Austen's sophisticated critique of the systemic injustices inherent in the nineteenth-century British class system, while underscoring the enduring relevance of these themes within contemporary social contexts.

References


Austen, J. (2004). Pride and prejudice (J. Kinsley, Ed.). Oxford University Press.

Bohang, M. B. A., Magfirah, S., & Nugroho, D. A. (2025). The social condition of England's women in 18th century reflected in Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(1), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v8i1.43533

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z

Eagleton, T. (1976). Marxism and literary criticism. University of California Press.

Eagleton, T. (2005). The novel: An introduction. Blackwell Publishing.

Fitriana, R. (2014). Social stratification reflected in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice novel (1813): A sociological approach. Jurnal Ilmiah Sastra, 2(1), 1-17.

Goldmann, L. (1977). The hidden god: A study of tragic vision in the Pensees of Pascal and the tragedies of Racine (P. Thody, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. International Publishers.

Ispriyani, N. (2008). Social problems and moral values in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice [Undergraduate thesis]. Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University.

Khan, S., Khan, M., & Salman, M. (2023). Marxist feminist analysis of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice: Unravelling class, property, and gender dynamics. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 5(2), 45-62.

Krisita, S., & Dewi, A. (2020). The influence of social class on women's attitude towards men in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice (1813): A sociological approach. Jurnal Ilmiah Sastra, 8(1), 45-55.

Lukács, G. (1971). History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialectics. MIT Press.

Marx, K. (1844). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Prometheus Books.

Marx, K. (1848). Manifesto of the communist party. In The communist manifesto. Penguin Books.

Marx, K. (1867). Das Kapital (Vol. 1). Regnery Publishing.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1846). The German ideology. International Publishers.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). The communist manifesto. Penguin Books.

Matutes, J. (2025). Economic incentives and class reproduction in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. Journal of Economic Literature and Culture, 12(1), 33-48.

Putri, D. A., Nurulhady, E. F., Suryadi, M., & Waluyo, S. (2024). Citra perempuan aristokrat Inggris abad-19 dalam novel. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra, 10(3), 2450-2459. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i3.3829

Putri, M. A., Bahri, S., & Suswati, R. (2017). Social class in British society in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. Linguistica, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.24114/jalu.v6i1.13396

Rahman, F., Khairunnisa, I., & Amir, M. P. (2023). The social condition of the 19th century British society depicted in Jane Austen's Mansfield Park novel. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 11(12), 1628-1643. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v11i12.sh02

Saeed, A., & Mocbil, A. (2024). Satire and social criticism in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. Journal of Language and Literature, 30(3), 132-144.

Sarah, R. (2022). Wealth and power in the novel Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. Call: Critical Analysis of Literature and Language, 4(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.15575/call.v4i2.14767

Uddin, M., & Sumaiya, T. (2025). The Empire of Etiquette Ideological Supremacy and Cultural Hegemony in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. NUB Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5, 71-8.

Yakumbu, R., & Ahmadi, A. (2025). Constrained agency and Marxist-feminist reading of Charlotte Lucas in Pride and Prejudice. Feminist Literary Studies, 8(1),




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/jol.v8i1.13286

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.