STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN USING CONDITIONAL SENTENCES

Syafrizal Azzali, Jumino Suhadi, Purwarno Purwarno

Abstract


This research was aimed at describing the students’ ability using conditional sentences and to investigate the dominant type of conditional sentences mastered by the eleventh-grade students using conditional sentences (type I, II, and III) at SMAS Istiqlal Delitua Academic Year 2022/2023. The design of this research was descriptive quantitative research and the instrument used in this research was an objective test or multiple choices. The population of this research was 210 students. Then, the researchers used a simple random sampling technique to take the sample and chose 30 students. The researchers found out: first, the mean score of students’ ability in using conditional sentences was 77.86; it was categorized as a “good” level; second, the dominant type of students’ ability in using conditional sentences was “type I” with a mean score of 0.88 or 38%. It means the process of teaching and learning English, more specifically, in Conditional Sentences, at SMAS Istiqlal Delitua Academic Year 2022/2023 has reached the standard.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Azar, B. S., & Hagen, S. A. (2009). Understanding and Using English Grammar. White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman.

Hornby, A. S. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary of Current English. New York: Oxford University Press.

Khotari, C. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International.

Kristina, W., Rufinus, A., & Maiza, M. (2020). Error analysis of conditional sentences. Journal of English Education and Literature, 1(1), 35-42.

Kurniati, E. (2017). The correlation of students’ listening habit in english conversation with vocabulary mastery of the second semester students’ english education at teacher training and education faculty at batanghari university academic year 2015/2016. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, (17)1, 227.

Nur, F. (2017). Aspects of difficulty of conditional sentences in business negotiation. ESENSI, 20(1), 38

Priyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Publisihing.

Suhadi, J. (2016). Course in English Structure. Medan: LPPM UISU PRESS.

Syafii, M. (2007). From Paragraph to A Research Report: A writing for Academic Purposes. Pekanbaru: Lsbi.

Wijaya, L., & Syahaf, N.S. (2018). Language as art and communication tool. paper presented at the 1st annual international conference on language and literature (pp. 69), 18-19 April, 2018, Medan, Indonesia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/jol.v5i2.7587

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU)
Jln. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Barat Medan, Indonesia
Phone: +627869911  | e-mail: journal_language@sastra.uisu.ac.id