MEANING AS A MARKER OF METAPHORICITY TOWARDS A COMPUTATIONAL IDENTIFICATION OF METAPHOR IN THE EVER-GLORIOUS QUR’ĀN

Amal Abdelsattar Metwally, Dalal Mahmoud Elgemei

Abstract


This work represents a novel direction for computational linguistics research on metaphor in the Ever-Glorious Qur’ān. The present study proposed a basic/non-basic meaning criterion as a marker for the computational identification of metaphor in the Ever-Glorious Qur’ān. The corpus was Sūrat Hūd, where manual identification for candidate metaphors was conducted by referring to four authentic exegeses, namely Tafsīr Aṭ-Ṭabarī (2010), Az-Zamakhshari (2007), Al-Qurṭubi (1964) and Ash-Sha’rāwi (1997) as well as Yūsuf ‘Ali interpretation of the meanings of the Ever-Glorious Qur’ān (1992). 22 metaphors were identified and classified based on the proposed semantic criterion. The data were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively, and candidates were classified into three categories depending on their meaning and their degree of metaphoricity. The study drew on the conceptual theory of metaphor by Lackoff & Johnson (1980), studies on metaphors in the Ever-Glorious Qur’ān, as well as computational studies of metaphor, in general, to finally arrive at a criterion that describes the meaning of metaphor towards a computational identification of metaphors in the Ever-Glorious Qur’ān. The study proposed a software input to detect metaphors by identifying their semantic features.


Keywords


Basic/non-basic meaning; metaphor; computational identification; the Ever-Glorious Qur’ān

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul-Raof, H. (2006). Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis. New York: Routledge.

Abū Libdeh, A. (2011). "Metaphor in Arabic Rhetoric: A Call for Innovation." Jordan Journal of Applied Sciences 13, no. 1 (2011): 227-242.

Al-Aṣfaḥāni, A. (1412). AlMufradāt fi Gharīb AlQuraꞌn “A Dictionary of Qurꞌānic Terms”. Dar AlQalam, Ad-dār Ash-shāmiyah Dimashq , Beirut.

Al-Jaḥiz, A. B. (1960). Al-Bayān Wal-Tabyīn. Cairo, Egypt: Al-Khanji.

Al-Jurjāni, A. (1966). Al-Wasata bayn al-Mutanabbi wal khusami. Cairo, Egypt: Issa al Babi al Halabi wa shurākah.

Al-Qurṭubi, A. (1964). Al-Jamiꞌ li Ahkam al-Qurꞌān Wal mubayin lima tadammana mina Assuna w Ahkam Alfurqan “Interpretation of the Meanings of the Qurꞌān “Dar Alkutub Almasryah, 2nd ed. Cairo.

Al-Sakkākī, Y. (1937). Muftāḥ Al‘ulūm “The Key of Sciences”. Maṭbaʻat Muṣṭafá al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī : El-Gamaleya, ,Cairo.

Ar-Razi, M. (1986). Mukhtar Aṣṣaḥāḥ . Maktabat Lebanon.

Ash-Sha’rāwi, M. (1997). Alkhawāṭir “The Thoughts”. Dar Akhbār Alyoum: Cairo.

Aṭ-Ṭabarī, M. (2010). Jamiꞌ Albayān ꞌAn ṭawīl āy AlQurꞌān “Collection of statements on interpretation of verses of the Qurꞌān ꞌ” Dar Alḥ adeeth AlKahira.

Az-Zamakhsharī, J. (2007). AlKash-shāf “The Revealer”. Beirut. DarEhyā Atturāth AlArabi.

Baumer, E. P. et al. (2009, August). metaViz: visualizing computationally identified metaphors in political blogs. In 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (Vol. 4, pp. 389-394). IEEE.

Beardsley, M. (1967). Entry:" Metaphor," Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. P. Edwards.

Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. Equinox.

Elhindi, Y. (2008). Metaphors in the Quran: Categories and Significance. In Paper presented at the sixth international conference on new directions in the humanities. DOI: 10.5296/ijl.v10i6.13827.

Goatly, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge,. Issue: July, Publisher: Association for Computational Linguistics, Pages: 688-697

Hanks, P. (2006). Metaphoricity is gradable. TRENDS IN LINGUISTICS STUDIES AND MONOGRAPHS, 171, 17.

Ibn Qutaibah, A. (1962). Tawil Mushkil al-Quran. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kotob al-’ ilmiya.

Jäkel, O. (2002). Hypotheses revisited: The cognitive theory of metaphor applied to religious texts. Metaphorik. de, 2(1), 20-42.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Martin, J. H. (1990). A Computational Model of Metaphor Interpretation. Academic Press Professional, Inc. Retrieved on July 12, 2014 from https://www.cs.colorado.edu/~martin/Papers/corpus-metaphor.pdf

Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation (Vol. 66). New York: Prentice Hall.

Richards, I. A. (1965). The philosophy of rhetoric (Vol. 94). J. Constable (Ed.). New York: Oxford Oxford University Press.

Shokr, M. (2006). The Metaphorical Concept “Life is a Journey” in the Qurꞌān: A cognitive-semantic analysis. In: metaphorik.de, 10, 94-132. Retrieved on September 12, 2012 from https://www.metaphorik.de/sites/www.metaphorik.de/files/journal-pdf/10_2006_shokr.pdf

Yūsuf ‘Ali, A. (1992). The meaning of the Holy Quran. (4th Ed.) USA, Maryland: Amana Corporation




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v6i1.5095

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra 
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU), Medan
Jl. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Medan 20217
Telp. (061) 7869911, e-mail: language_literacy@sastra.uisu.ac.id