WORD ORDER IN ANGKOLA LANGUAGE: A STUDY OF SYNTACTIC TYPOLOGY

Jamaluddin Nasution, Mulyadi Mulyadi

Abstract


This study aims to discover what and how the typology of Angkola Language (AL) is in word order as well as to determine its grammatical alliance. The application of qualitative methods was carried out descriptively to this study, it means that the data analyzed and the results are in the form of a phenomenon description. The stages in this research are data collection, data analysis, and presentation of data analysis results/conclusions. The conclusion of this study is the word order, namely: (1) declarative sentences in AL are in the pattern of: a) Verb + Subject + Object for intransitive; b) Verb + Object + Subject for transitive; (2) The negation sentences have 2 patterns: a) Negation + Subject + Verb + Object; b) Subject + Negation + Verb + Object; (3) Interrogative sentences have 3 patterns: a) Subject + Verb + Object; b) Verb + Subject + Object; and c) Passive-Verb + Subject + Object; and (4) Imperative sentences have 2 patterns: a) Verb + Object (subject disappears); and b) Verb + Subject + Object (similar to a declarative sentence). In AL, the argument Agent (A) behaves the same as the argument Subject (S) and is different from the argument Patient (P); therefore, this language pattern is classified as an accusative type. It is expected that there will be a syntactic typology researches in AL which examine the syntactic typology comprehensively as an effort to preserve and maintain local/ethnic languages.

Keywords


Language Typology; Angkola Language

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anwar, M. (2019). Konstruksi kosubordinasi dalam bahasa Indonesia (perspektif linguistic fungsional). Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 8(1), 1–17.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Artawa, K. (1998). Bahasa Bali: Sebuah Kajian Tipologi Sintaksis. Jurnal Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia: Jakarta.

Basaria, I. (2018). Relasi Gramatikal Subjek Bahasa Pakpak Dairi: Kajian Tipologi. Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA), 1(1), 49–58.

Budiarta, I. W. (2013). Tipologi Sintaksis Bahasa Kemak. Disertasi). Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.

Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and morphology. University of Chicago press.

Dixon, R. M. W., & Dixon, R. M. W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge University Press.

Hutapea, E. (2020). Indonesia Punya 718 Bahasa Ibu, Jangan Sampai Punah. Kompas. Com. Diambil Dari.

Jufrizal, J. (2018). Fenomena Tipologi Gramatikal Bahasa Minangkabau: Akusatif, Ergatif, Atau Campur? Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajarannya, 3(1).

Khairah, M., & Ridwan, S. H. (2014). Sintaksis: Memahami satuan kalimat perspektif fungsi. Jakarat: Bumi Aksara.

Mallinson, G., & Blake, B. J. (1981). Language Typology: Cross-linguistic studies in syntax. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Miles, M. B. H. A. M. dan S. J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). New York: Sage Publications.

Mulyadi. (2007). Kalimat Koordinasi Bahasa Indonesia Sebuah Ancangan Tipologi Sintaktis. USU-IR Repository, 3(2). https://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/16717/log-okt2007-3 %287%29.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

Narbuko, C., & Achmadi, A. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nasution, J. (2021). Revitalisasi Bahasa Angkola-Mandailing Melalui Penerjemahan Buku Tematik. Jurnal Pustaka Mitra (Pusat Akses Kajian Mengabdi Terhadap Masyarakat), 1(2), 129–134.

Panggabean, S. (2013). Konstruksi Tipologi Sintaksis Bahasa Batak Toba. http://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/39037.

Rizki, A., & Pujiati, P. (2017). TATA URUT KATA DALAM BAHASA ARAB (TIPOLOGI SINTAKSIS). ITTIHAD, 1(2).

Siminto, S. (2013). Pengantar Linguistik. Jakarta: Cipta Prima Nusantara.

Siwi, P. (2018). Sintaksis Bahasa Siladang: Kajian Tipologi Gramatikal. http://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/10602

Song, J. J. (2018). Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stamouli, I., & Huggard, M. (2007). Phenomenography as a tool for understanding our students. International Symposium for Engineering Education, 181–186.

Surbakti. (2013a). Pelindungan Bahasa Daerah dalam Kerangka Kebijakan Nasional Kebahasaan. Https://Badanbahasa.Kemdikbud.Go.Id/Lamanbahasa/Content/Pelindungan-Bahasa-Daerah-Dalam-Kerangka-Kebijakan-Nasional-Kebahasaan.

Sugiyono, D. (2013b). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Surbakti, E. B. (2012). Tipologi Sintaksis Bahasa Karo. Jurnal Telangkai Bahasa Dan Sastra, Januari, 55–73.

Umar, H. (2013). Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Umiyati, M. (2015). Prioritas Aspek-Aspek Tipologi Linguistik Pada Pemetaan Masalah-Masalah Kebahasaan. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 1(2), 279–297.

Van Valin Jr, R. D. (2005). Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v6i1.5184

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra 
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU), Medan
Jl. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Medan 20217
Telp. (061) 7869911, e-mail: language_literacy@sastra.uisu.ac.id