THE ALLOMORPHY IN ENGLISH WORDS: MORPHOLOGY AND PHONOLOGY INTERRELATED APPROACH

Karana Jaya Tarigan, Milisi Sembiring

Abstract


The article aims to analyze which allomorphs occur more accurately in English and what factors determine them. The problems that the researchers examine enable English learners and readers to pronounce English words, in this case, English morphemes. The theory employed by the researchers is morphophonemics, dealing with how morphemes alter their appearance or pronunciation in response to the sounds that surround them in a given piece of content. The approach or method that the researchers use in this article is descriptive qualitative method based on the data.  The findings that the researchers come  across are as follows: (a) the definitive article, (b) the definitive article, (c) Derivation, (d) Irregular verbs, (e) Past tense marker (-ed), (f) Present tense morpheme, (g) Plural noun markers, (h) Possessive markers. It can be seen that the shape or pronunciation of an English word depends on the linguistic environment in which it occurs, and it is obvious that morphophonemic change involves not only replacing but also changing the phonological shape of a morpheme. Based on the data, the researchers find that there are two basic types of allomorph, such as morphophonemic changes and suppletion. The researchers also attend to the theory of Pike, stating that sounds tend to be influenced by their environments.


Keywords


lexical; morphology; phonology; suppletion; morpheme; linguistic environment and morphophonemics; allomorph

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aronoff & Fudeman. (2010). What is morphology. Wiley Blackwell

Bauer, J. C. (2003). Role ambiguity and role clarity: A comparison of attitudes in Germany and the United States. Dissertation. University of Cincinnati – Clermont.

Bickford, W. B., (1993). Mechanics of solid: Concepts & application. Richard Irwy, INC.

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. Holt Rinehart and Winston.

Bussmann, H. (1996) Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. Routledge.

Hadari, N. & Mini, M. (1996). Penelitian terapan. Gajah Mada University Press.

Haspelmath. M (2002). Understanding morphology. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271018639_Understanding_Morphology

Katamba, F. (1993). Modern Linguistics: Morphology. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

Matthew, A. (1974). A treatise on time and space. Analytic Philosophy 15 (1): 10-12. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0149.1974.tb01533.x.

McCarthy, A. (2002). An Introduction to English morphology: Words and their structure. MPG books Ltd.

O’Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M. & Katamba, F. (1980). Contemporary linguistics: An introduction. Longman.

Payne, M., (2006). What is profesional social work? BASW.

Plag, I. (2002), Word-formation in English. Cambridge University

Wolfram & Johnson. (1982). Phonological analysis: Focus on American English. Prentice Hall Regents.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v7i1.7075

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra 
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU), Medan
Jl. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Medan 20217
Telp. (061) 7869911, e-mail: language_literacy@sastra.uisu.ac.id