Penggambaran Eksploitasi Hewan dan Lingkungan dalam Novel “O” Karya Eka Kurniawan

Kurnia Wulandari

Abstract


This study investigates the representations of animal and environmental exploitation in the Indonesian novel O by Eka Kurniawan (2016) through the lens of ecocritical theory. The research is motivated by the increasing concern over human domination of nature, often expressed through acts of exploitation that disregard ecological balance. The central research question explores how characters within the novel engage with animals and their surroundings and how these interactions reflect broader environmental issues. Employing a qualitative descriptive method, this study collects data from narrative elements—words, phrases, clauses, and sentences—found in the novel using close reading and note-taking techniques. The findings reveal multiple instances of anthropocentric behavior, in which animals are commodified and the environment is degraded to fulfill human desires. These acts not only highlight a lack of environmental consciousness but also reinforce a power hierarchy between humans and nature. The study concludes that the novel offers a critical reflection on the ethical dimensions of human–nature relationships, urging readers to reconsider their role in the ecological crisis.

Keywords


Ecocriticism; environmental exploitation; animal studies; anthropocentrism; Indonesian literature.

References


Arluke, A., Lankford, A., & Madfis, E. (2018). Harming animals and massacring humans: Characteristics of public mass and active shooters who abused animals. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 36(6), 739–751. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2385

Dewi, N. (2016). Ekokritik dalam Sastra Indonesia: Kajian Sastra yang Memihak. Adabiyyat: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 15(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2016.15102

Drake, P. (2015). Marxism and the Nonhuman Turn: Animating Nonhumans, Exploitation, and Politics with ANT and Animal Studies. Rethinking Marxism, 27(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2014.980677

Habib, R. (2011). Literary criticism from Plato to the present: An introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.

Hö Lker, F., Wolter, C., Perkin, E. K., & Tockner, K. (2010). Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(12), 681–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.007

Joo, S., & Chun, M. S. (2022). A discourse analysis on eating dog meat in South Korea for 20 years. In Transforming Food Systems: Ethics, Innovation and Responsibility (pp. 387–391). Wageningen Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-939-8_60

Kabir, M., Habiba, U. E., Khan, W., Shah, A., Rahim, S., Rios-Escalante, P. R. D. los, Farooqi, Z. U. R., & Ali, L. (2023). Climate change due to increasing concentration of carbon dioxide and its impacts on environment in 21st century; A mini review. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 35(5), 102693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2023.102693

Lazuardy, M. B., Suwasono, A. A., & Utama, A. (2018). Perancangan video animasi tentang pencegahan konsumsi daging anjing di masyarakat perkotaan. Indonesian Art Journal, 12(2), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.24821/ekp.v12i2.11531

Lehnen, L. (2020). Ecocriticism in Brazil: The wastelands of Ana Paula Maia’s fictions. Romance Quarterly, 67(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08831157.2020.1698888

Mbwambo, L., Eid, T., Malimbwi, R. E., Zahabu, E., Kajembe, G. C., & Luoga, E. (2012). Impact of decentralised forest management on forest resource conditions in Tanzania. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 21(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2012.698583

Nasution, E. K. (2022). Short communication: Kajian etik, kesejahteraan, dan kesehatan hewan dalam fenomena topeng monyet. INSOLOGI: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, 1(6), 915–921. https://doi.org/10.55123/insologi.v1i6.606

Nayar, P. K. (2009). Contemporary literary and cultural theory: From structuralism to ecocriticism. Pearson Education India.

Nofrahadi, A., Andayani, S., Suyitno, & Wardani, N. E. (2022). Representation of functions of natural environment settings in the Kaba Minangkabau: An ecocritical study. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 22(4), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2204-12

Nurhapidah, A. A., & Sobari, T. (2019). Kajian sosiologi sastra novel Kembali karya Sofia Mafaza. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 529–533. https://proceeding.unindra.ac.id/index.php/semnasbsi/article/view/366

Tallichet, S. E., & Hensley, C. (2005). Rural and urban differences in the commission of animal cruelty. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(6), 711–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X04274186

Wiyatmi. (2016). Conquest and care for the preservation of nature and environment in the novel Amba by Laksmi Pamuntjak: Study ecocriticism. Humaniora. Retrieved from http://www.rayakultura.net

Yuliyani, L. (2023). Hubungan manusia dengan lingkungan dalam cerpen Kayu Naga karya Korrie Layun Rampan (Kajian ekokritik Greg Garrard). Medan Makna: Jurnal Ilmu Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan, 21(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.26499/mm.v21i1.5244




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/bahastra.v9i2.9701

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Bahastra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia

Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, FKIP - Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Kampus Induk UISU Jl. Sisingamangaraja XII Teladan, Medan
Email: prodipbsi@fkip.uisu.ac.id | bahastra@fkip.uisu.ac.id 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.