Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Korupsi Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Jabatan Di Dinas Pendidikan Nias Selatan (Studi Putusan No. 10/pid.sus.tpk/2017/pn.medan)

Sonya Airini Batubara

Abstract


Corruption is very closely related to the factor of abuse of authority or influence that exists on someone’s position as an official who deviates from the legal provisions so that the action is detrimental to the economy and state finances. The purpose of writing this study is to find out and to analyze whether in case of the misuse of authority in the Payment of Teacher Professional Allowances, the corruptor has got appropriate punishment by law. The research method used in the writing is normative research that uses a statue approach and conceptual approach.The conclusion of the study is that the application of criminal law both formally and materially in the Corruption Crime of Abuse of Authority by the Treasurer in Decision No.10 / PID.SUS.TPK / 2017 / PN.MEDAN is appropriate, and in terms of the application of material criminal law,  the actions of the defendant Maranatha Dachi. SPd. has fulfilled the element of offense as the subsidiary indictment was chosen by the Panel of Judges which states that the Defendant is found guilty of committing Corruption Crime which was regulated in Law No.20 of 2001 concerning Amendment to Law No.31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes, and  in making decisions against the Corruption of Abuse of Corruption by the Treasurer at the South Nias Education Office Decision No.10 / PID.SUS.TPK / 2017 / PN.MEDAN. The Panel of Judges uses judicial and non-juridical considerations. However, according to the Writer, the judge should dig deeply into the non-juridical considerations primarily concerning matters that incriminate the Defendant.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Daftar Pustaka

A. Buku

Ermansjah Djaja, Memberantas Korupsi Bersama KPK (Komisi PemberantasanKorupsi), jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme di Indonesia Semarang, Badan Penerbit Undip, 2005.

Paulus Efendi Lotulung, Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Kekuasaan, Jakarta, Salemba Humanika, 2013.

Riawan Tjandra, Teori dan Praktik Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara,Yogyakarta, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2011

Robert Kligoard, Penuntun Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Pemerintahan Daerah, Jakarta, Yayasan Obor Indonesia. 2005.

Romli Atmasasmita. Sekitar Masalah Korupsi, Aspek Nasional dan Aspek Internasional, Bandung,Mandar Maju, 2004.

Teguh Prasetyo dan Abdul Halim Barkatullah, Politik Hukum Pidana (Kajian Kebijakan Kriminalisasi Dan Dekriminalisasi), Jakarta, Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.

B. Sumber Undang-Undang

UU No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang perubahan atas UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

UU No. 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

UU No. 46 Tahun 2009 tentang Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.

C. Sumber jurnal

Patardo Yosua Andreas Naibaho, Purwoto, Pujiono, “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Peran Serta Masyarakat Dalam Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Diponegoro law jurnal.

D. Sumber internet

https://www.google.co.id/search, Minggu, 20 Mei 2018.

http://www.ti.or.id search tanggal 21 mei 2018.

http://seputarpengertian.blogspot.com/2016/10/pengertian-wewenang-kewenangan.htmlsearch tanggal 21 mei 2018.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v18i2.1168

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.