PELAKSANAAN MEDIASI DALAM   PERMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2016  DAN PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2022  (Suatu Perbandingan)

Maria Rosalina

doi:10.30743/jhk.v22i3.6979

PELAKSANAAN MEDIASI DALAM PERMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2016 DAN PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2022 (Suatu Perbandingan)

Maria Rosalina

Abstract

Before examining, adjudicating and deciding on the main case, the panel of judges first orders the parties to mediate. Advances in science, technology and communication also have an impact on the implementation of manual mediation, as stipulated in Perma No.1 of 2016. As a result, Perma No.1 of 2016 is refined with Perma No.3 of 2022 where mediation can be carried out directly or electronically, based on the agreement of the parties. Of course there are differences and similarities in the implementation of mediation regulated in No.1 of 2016 and Perma No.3 of 2022. Keywords: Mediation, Perma, A Comparison

Full Text:

PDF

References

A. Buku

H.Ahmad Fathoni Ramli, Administrasi Peradilan Agama, Pola Bindalmin dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama dalam Praktek, CV Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2013.

K.Wantjik Saleh, Hukum Acara Perdata, RBg / HIR, Ghalia Indonesia, 1983.

M. Yahya Harahap, Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistem Peradilan Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1997

B. Jurnal

Selamat, Lumban Gaol, Pengaturan Hukum Mediasi Di Pengadilan Oleh Mahkamah Agung, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma , Volume 7 No. 1, September 2016.

C.Peraturan

Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan

Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 Tentang Mediasi Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v22i3.6979