REKONSTRUKSI FILSAFAT MATEMATIKA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI UNTUK MATERI PENDIDIKAN KONTEMPORER

Anggi Anatasia Kinanti, Mislah Nasution, Sartika Manurung


Abstract


The development of digital technology and the demands of 21st-century competencies require mathematics learning to move beyond procedural approaches. This article aims to compile a conceptual and empirical synthesis of the integration of mathematical philosophy and information technology-based learning, as well as to test its influence through comparative simulation analysis. The study was conducted through a systematic literature review of research related to the philosophy of mathematics, humanistic and constructivist approaches, and IT-based learning models. To strengthen the empirical argument, a paired t-test simulation was conducted based on the average score increase reported in various experimental studies. The findings indicate that the integration of philosophical and technological approaches is not only statistically significant but also substantively pedagogical. Theoretically, these results confirm that an epistemological paradigm shift—from knowledge transmission to active construction—is a key factor in improving learning outcomes. Thus, the effectiveness of technology-based learning is highly dependent on its underlying philosophical foundation.


Keywords


literature review; contemporary education; philosophical reconstruction

References


Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. Falmer Press.

Fairus, F., Dewi, I., & Simamora, E. (2023). Keterkaitan filsafat matematika dengan model pembelajaran berbasis IT. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 538–549.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Handoko, H., et al. (2022). Filsafat humanisme dalam pembelajaran matematika dan pembentukan karakter siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.

Hendrayanto. (2019). Penerapan filsafat konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika.

Hohenwarter, M., & Fuchs, K. (2004). Combination of dynamic geometry, algebra and calculus in the software system GeoGebra. In Proceedings of the Computer Algebra Systems and Dynamic Geometry Systems in Mathematics Teaching Conference.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report. Keele University and Durham University.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Mulyati, S., & Evendi, H. (2020). Pengaruh pemanfaatan teknologi informasi terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.

Schindler, M., Burkhardt, U., Moritz, B., & Müller, K. (2017). Computers in mathematics education: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(3), 239–273.

Shobrun, Y., & Dewi, I. (2022). Pembelajaran matematika berbasis teknologi dalam perspektif filsafat matematika. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 162–177.

Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Suratman, S., et al. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.

The Liang Gie. (1980). Filsafat matematika. Yogyakarta: Karya Kencana.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/mes.v11i2.13088

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.