Word Cloud Visualization of Media Reactions to USAID Shutdown

Sinta Rahmadani, Imam Yuadi

Abstract


The closure of USAID prompted various reactions by the media, which in turn affected public opinion and ongoing policies. This research investigates how media narratives cover the shutdown of USAID using word cloud visualization to capture themes and sentiments. The research attempts to find: What are the dominant media narratives regarding the shutdown? Using tokenization, stopword elimination, and frequency analysis before generating a word cloud to illustrate prominent words. The data shows that US media focuses on government spending, foreign aid, employment, and diplomatic activity, which all influence the public perception of the shutdown. The study argues that computational text analysis aids in the understanding of media discourse and sentiments on policies, which help policymakers and scholars concerned with public opinion and policy discourse on international aid and development issues. This study advances the field of media by expanding the scope of the study of visual politics and political communication. The analysis reveals that the conversation revolves around government activities, consequences of foreign aid, workforce considerations, and spatial politics, with “funding,” “security,” and “diplomatic” standing out the most. The analysis of the media coverage shows that the shutdown is framed as a political as well as an economic crisis, constructing a narrative that is later used in public discourse and policy discussions. This project adds to the body of work on media by employing visual analysis in the study of political communication and analyzing media framing from a computational perspective.

Keywords


USAID shutdown; media framing; word cloud visualization; natural language processing; political communication

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, M., & Hassan, N. (2022). A survey of computational framing analysis approaches. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 9335–9348. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.63

Bennet, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.

Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826

Cooley, A., & Ron, J. (2002). The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action. International Security, 27(1), 5–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228802320231217

Dupuy, K., Ron, J., & Prakash, A. (2016). Hands off my regime! Governments’ restrictions on foreign aid to NGOs. World Development, 84, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.02.001

Edwards, M. (2014). Civil society. John Wiley & Sons.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Fitri, S., Muhammad, T., Riki, C., & Sampath, S. (2023). Data visualization for students’ perception toward online and offline learning in information technology education program. International Journal of Quantitative Research and Modeling, 4(3), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijqrm.v4i3.500

Heimerl, F., Lohmann, S., Lange, S., & Ertl, T. (2014). Word cloud explorer: Text analytics based on word clouds. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1833–1842. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.231

Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.

Kim, S.-M., & Hovy, E. (2003). Determining the Sentiment of Opinions. Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.

Lazer, D., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., & Schudson, M. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

Pallas, C. L., & Sidel, M. (2020). Foreign Aid Reduction and Local Civil Society: Recent Research and Policy Guidance for Donors and International NGOs. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 11(1), 1007–1025. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0045

Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), 1–135. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011

Patil, D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in marketing and advertising: Advancing personalization and optimizing consumer engagement strategies. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(3), 45-67. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5057404

Rubenstein, J. C. (2017). Between Samaritans and states: The political ethics of humanitarian INGOs. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684106.001.0001

Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication Methods and Measures, 13(4), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x

Walter, D., & Ophir, Y. (2019). News frame analysis: An inductive mixed-method computational approach. Journal of Communication, 69(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1639145

Zhang, Y. (2020). The Belt and Road Initiative in global media: A discourse analysis of China's leadership narratives. Journal of Contemporary China, 29(124), 278-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2019.1637567




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/mkd.v9i1.10777

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Sinta Rahmadani, Imam Yuadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

MUKADIMAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sejarah, dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial

Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, FKIP, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Medan
Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

This works is licensed under CC BY 4.0