PENGARUH KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA DAN KEPUASAN KERJA TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN BAGIAN KEPEGAWAIAN PADA KANTOR DINAS KEHUTANAN MEDAN

Tri Kartika Yudha, Sya frizal, Rosperasi Juni Sartika Saragih

Abstract


In the observation that researchers do at the Medan Forestry Service office is not yet effective and efficient in the application of occupational safety and Health at the Medan Forestry Service office, not fully meet the quality and the quantity set in the application of job satisfaction at the Medan Forestry Service office, not optimal in the application of occupational safety The purpose of this research is to know the effect of occupational safety and health to employee productivity, the effect of job satisfaction on employee productivity, the effect of occupational safety and Health and work satisfaction on employee productivity. This research uses quantitative analysis methods. The population in this weaver is the number of employees of Medan Forestry Service office as many as 30 people as samples of research. As for the technical analysis of data used is multiple linear regression using SPSS 21. The result of this research is occupational safety and health towards employee productivity work is acceptable for the reason of the T-Calculate value of occupational safety and Health 0.263 and its significance value 0.794, while the T-table value at the rate of 95% (0.05) is 2,770. The value of the T-count < T-table (0.263 < 2,770) was decided in the study of occupational safety and health in a partial positive and insignificant impact on employee work productivity. Job satisfaction on employee productivity work is acceptable for the reason T-calculate work satisfaction 3,705 and its significance value 0.001 while the T-table value at the confidence level of 95% (0.05) is 2,770. The value of T-count < T-table (3,705 < 2,770), then in this research is anini. Work satisfaction is partially positive and significant to the employee's work productivity. Occupational safety and health and work satisfaction towards employee productivity. This is evidenced that the value of significance for occupational health and safety and work satisfaction simultaneously on employee productivity is 0.000 < 0.05 and F-count value of 15.370 < F-Table 3.35, so that it can be concluded that occupational safety and health and work satisfaction simultaneously have a positive influence on employees ' work productivity. That hypothesis of This research was received. . On test determinations R Square (R2) amounted to 0.532 or 5.4%. Occupational safety and Health and work satisfaction of employees ' work productivity amounted to 5.4%. The remainder is 94.6% influenced or spelled out by other variables that are not included in this category of research models.

Keyword : Occupational safety and health, work satisfaction, productivity



Full Text:

PDF

References


A.A Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, tahun 2006, Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Pen. PT Refika Aditama

A.A Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, tahun 2009 , Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia,PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S (2006). Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Eko, Widodo Suparno. 2015. Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia.Yogyakarta: PUSTAKA PELAJAR.

Duwi Priyatno, 2013. Mandiri Belajar Analisis Data dengan SPSS, Mediakom.

Danang. Sunyoto (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.Yogyakarta: CAPS (Center for Academic Publishing Service)

Kreitner, Kinicki. 2010. Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill

Mangkunegara, A.A Anwar Prabu ( 2007). Manajaemen SDM perusahaan Bandung Rosda Karya

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2008. Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: RFLIKA ADITAMA.

Mankunegara P. Anwar, 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung

Mondy, R. W dan Noe, R. M, Human Resources Management 9th ed. Prentice: Massachu Setts, 2005

Mondy, R Wayne , 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia edisi kesepuluh. Jakarta: Erlangga

Rivai, Veithzal. 2005. Performance Appraisal Sistem Yang Tepat Untuk Menilai Kinerja Karyawan Dan Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahaan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo

Riduwan dan Engkos Achmad Kuncoro. 2008. Cara Menggunakan dan Memakai Analisis Jalur (Path Analysis). Cetakan II. Bandung. Alfabeta.

Robbins, et al. 2007. Buku Ajar Patologi Vol 2Penerbit Buku Kedokteran EGC : Jakarta

Robbins,Stephen P. and Timothy A. Judge.Organizational Behevior. New Jersey : Pearson Education, Inc.,2011

Suma'mur, 2006.Higene Perusahaan dan Kesehatan Kerja. Jakarta, Gunung Agung.

Sedarmayanti. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Refikaditama.

Sutrisno, Edy. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Bisnis.Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Sugiyono, 2013 . Metodelogi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : ALFABETA

Swasto, Bambang, 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Malang : UB Press

Sekaran, Uma dan Roger Bougie (2010) Manajemen, Edisi 8. Diterjemahkan oleh : Tarry Slamet : PT. Indeks Group Gramedia, Jakarta

Veithzal Rivai, 2004 . Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan. Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Wibowo , Perilaku dalam Oragisasi –Ed.3-Cet .5-Depok :Rajawali Pers,2017

Widodo, Suparno Eko. 2015. Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.