Pelaksanaan Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana Dengan Acara pemeriksaan singkat

Muhammad Ridwan Lubis

Abstract


The implementation of criminal examinations using a short examination procedure is only carried out in cases of crimes or violations which do not include minor crimes, which according to the Public Prosecutor, the proof and application of the law is easy and simple in nature. In accordance with the provisions of Article 203 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, those examined according to the short examination procedure are cases of crimes or violations which do not fall under the provisions of Article 205 and which according to the public prosecutor, the proof and application of the law is easy and simple in nature. During a brief examination, the defendant's rights are still taken into account, such as the right to be immediately tried by the Court (Article 50 paragraph (3), the right to be informed clearly in a language he understands about what he is accused of (Article 51 letter b), the right to give information in a clear manner. free to the judge (Article 52). Based on this conclusion, the author suggests that the judge who examines the brief examination proceedings wisely and tactfully pays attention to judicial principles and considers the interests of the parties to the dispute, so that a simple, fast and low-cost trial can be achieved. Therefore, it is recommended that the judge who examines the brief examination proceedings wisely and tactfully pays attention to the principles of justice and considers the interests of the parties to the dispute, so that a simple, fast and low-cost trial can be achieved.

Keywords: Examination, Crime, Short Examination Procedure.


Keywords


Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah Medan

Full Text:

PDF

References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Andi Hamzah., Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, CV. Sapta Artha Jaya, Jakarta, 2013.

Bambang Poernomo., Orientasi Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Amarta Buku, Yogyakarta, 2014.

H.Harmat Hamid dan H. Harun Husein., Pembahasan Permasalahan KUHAP Bidang Penyidikan, sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2014.

M. Yahya Harahap., Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Pustaka Kartini, Jakarta, 2016.

M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2005,

Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, Penerapan Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Delik Korupsi (Undang – Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999), CV Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2001,

P.A.F. Lumintang, Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Dengan Pembahasan Secara Yuridis Menurut Yurisprudensi dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Hukum Pidana, Sinar Baru, Bandung, 1984,

Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Edisi Ketiga, Cetakan Keempat, 2005,

R. Soesilo, Hukum Acara Pidana (Prosedur Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Menurut KUHAP Bagi Penegak Hukum), Politeia, Bogor, 2002,




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v23i3.9625

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Ridwan Lubis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat

Fakultas Hukum - Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Jl. Sisingamangaraja, Teladan, Medan 20217

Website: https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/jhk
Email: hukum_kaidah@fh.uisu.ac.id

Jurnal Kaidah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License