KONTRIBUSI MODEL INQUIRY TERBIMBING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI MANAJEMEN PADA MATA KULIAH MATEMATIKA EKONOMI

Irvan Malay

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine the contribution of the guided inquiry learning model to the reasoning ability of students. This research is a quasi-experimental study using two groups of samples (experimental and control) that have been declared normal and homogeneous. The study was conducted at SMP Negeri 27 Medan in 8th-grade students with two classes sample, each class with 40 students. The instrument used was in the form of a reasoning ability test consisting of pretest questions (6 items) and posttests (3 items) which have been declared valid and reliable. The results showed that in the guided inquiry class, students 'reasoning ability was influenced by the KAM value of 66%, while in the expository class, students' reasoning ability was influenced by the KAM value of 71.3%. This shows that the contribution of KAM in the guided inquiry class is smaller than the contribution of KAM in the expository class on reasoning ability (66% <71.3%). 


Keywords


reasoning ability, guided inquiry model, mathematical ability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azni, T.N., & Jailani. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Trigonometri Berbasis Strategi Pembelajaran Inquiry Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2 (2), 284-295.

Berg, C., Anders R., Bergendahl, V., Christina B., & Lundberg, B.K.S. (2003). Benefiting from an Open-Ended Experiment? A Comparison of Attitudes to, and Outcomes of, an Expository Versus an Open-Inquiry Version of the same Experiment.International Journal of Science Education, 25 (3), 351 – 372.

Hilman & Retnawati, H. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika SMP dengan Metode Inquiry pada Persamaan dan Pertidaksamaan Linear Satu Variabel. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2 (1), 40-50.

Murningsih, I.M.T., Masykuri, M., & Mulyani, B. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Sikap Ilmiah dan Prestasi Belajar Kimia Mahasiswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2 (2), 177 – 189.

Nindiasari, H., Novaliyosi, & Subhan, A. (2016). Desain Didaktis Tahapan Kemampuan dan Disposisi Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Kependidikan, 46 (2), 219-232.

Rahayu, N. (2017). Pengaruh Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Inquiry terhadap Penguasaan Konsep dan Scientific Skill Materi Sistem Pencernaan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3 (1), 70-77

Rizta,A., Zulkardi, &Hartono, Y. (2013). Pengembangan Soal Penalaran Model TIMSS Matematika SMP. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17 (2), 230-240.

Saragih, S. (2011). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran dan Locus of Control Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Mahasiswa.Jurnal Kependidikan, Volume 41 (2), 108 – 119.

Sariningsih, R., & Herdiman, I. (2017). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Penalaran Statistik dan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Mahamahasiswa Melalui PendekatanOpen-ended. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4 (2), 239-246.

Sever, D., & Güven, M. (2014). Effect of Inquiry-based Learning Approach on Student Resistance in a Science and Technology Course. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14 (4), 1601-1605

Sigler, E. A. & Saam, J. (2006). Teacher Candidates’ Conceptual Understanding of Conceptual Learning: From Theory to Practice. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 6 (1): 118 - 126.

Siregar, N. C., & Marsigit. (2015). Pengaruh Pendekatan Discovery yang Menekankan Aspek Analogi Terhadap Prestasi Belajar, Kemampuan Penalaran, Kecerdasan Emosional Spiritual. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2 (2), 224-234.

Spronken-Smith, R., Angelo, T. Matthews, H, O’Steen, B.& Robertson, J. (2007). How effective is inquiry-based learning in linking teaching and research? Disajika dalam Seminar an International Colloquium on International Policies and Practices for Academic Enquiry, Marwell, Winchester, UK, 19-21 April, 2007.

Stylianides, G.J., & Silver, E.A. (2009). Reasoning and Proving in School Mathematics: A Case of Pattern Identification. dalam Stylianou, D. A., Blanton, M. L., dan Knuth, E. J. (Ed). Teaching and Learning Proof Across the Grades: a K-16 Perspective; hal. 235-249. New York: Routledge.

Syahputra, E. (2016). Statistika Terapan. Medan: Unimed Press.

Taylor, J., & Bilbrey, J. (2012). Effectiveness of inquiry Based and

Teacher Directed Instruction in an Alabama Elementary School.Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, vol. 8, 1 – 17.

Trna, J., Trnova, E., & Sibor, J. (2012). Implementation of Inquiry-Based Science Education in Science Teacher Training. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 2 (4), 199 – 209.

Tuan, Hsiao-Lin., Chin, Chi-Chin., Tsai., Chi-Chung & Cheng, Su-Fey. (2005). Investigating the Effectiveness of Inquiry Instruction on the Motivation of Different Learning Styles Students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 3, 541–566.

Wibowo, A. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik dan Saintifik terhadap Prestasi Belajar, Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis dan Minat Belajar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4 (1), 1-10.

Widiastuti & Santoso, R.H. (2014). Pengaruh Metode Inquiry terhadap Ketercapaian Kompetensi Dasar, Rasa Ingin Tahu, dan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Vol 9 (2), 196-204

Williams, J.P., Pollini, S., Nubla-Kung, Abigail, M., Snyder, A.E., Garcia, A., Ordynans, J.G., & Atkins, J.G. (2014). An Intervention to Improve Comprehension of Cause/Effect Through Expository Text Structure Instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106 (1), 1 – 17.

Zaini, A., & Marsigit. (2014). Perbandingan Keefektifan Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik dan Konvensional Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Penalaran dan Komunikasi Matematik Mahasiswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1 (2), 152-163.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/mes.v7i2.5140

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.