Preferensi Agama dan Profesionalisme dalam Film The Endgame: Sebuah Analisis Wacana Kritis

Abdul Gaffar

Abstract


Reformation is a milestone in the improvement of the Indonesian nation after being ruled by the new order for 32 years. This article discussed the dynamics of corruption and corruption eradication institutions in the film The endgame. This film revealed an effort to eliminate employees of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) through the national insight test. The elimination was considered because they were radical and part of the Taliban police and those who handled major cases, but it was not explained whether KPK employees who passed the national insight test include those who handled major cases or not. The method used in this article is critical discourse analysis. critical discourse analysis is a method that effort to see the relationship between language and text and the social context in which language is used. The result of this study revealed that the film The Endgame did not reveal the fact that 75 KPK employees were removed with the national insight test. Instead of showing arguments that lead to the fact, this film tends to attack the parties involved in the national insight test, for example, the leaders of the KPK, the state civil service agency (BKN, and the compilers of questions in the test. Religious preference is used to legitimize the opinion that they are excluded because the religious preference. Professionalism was not a concern in this film.

Keywords


Religious preference; professionalism; radicalism; Taliban; KPK

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B. S. (2006). The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology. Penguin.

Andersson, S., & Heywood, P. M. (2009). The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency International’s Approach to Measuring Corruption. Political Studies, 57(4), 746–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00758.x

Arifin, Z., & Irsan. (2019). Korupsi Perizinan dalam Perjalanan Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia. Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2).

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2011). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Open Road Media.

Bourdieu, P. (2012). Arena Produksi Kultural: Sebuah Kajian Sosiologi Budaya. Kreasi Wacana.

Criado, C., Muñoz-González, C., & Pozo-Bayón, M. Á. (2021). Differences in salivary flow and composition between age groups are correlated to dynamic retronasal aroma perception during wine consumption. Food Quality and Preference, 87, 104046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104046

Dahlia, D., Harahap, D., & Lubis, Y. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Di Kantor Kelurahan Pasar Baru Kecamatan Sei Tualang Raso Kota Tanjungbalai. Strukturasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Administrasi Publik, 2(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31289/strukturasi.v2i2.51

Haryatmoko. (2016). Membongkar Rezim Kepastian: Pemikiran Kritis Post-Strukturalis. Kanisius.

Isra, S., Yuliandri, Amsari, F., & Tegnan, H. (2017). Obstruction of justice in the effort to eradicate corruption in Indonesia. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 51, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.07.001

Jamilah. (2015). Pertanggujawaban Hukum dalam Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Marcatoria, 18(2).

Kamahi, U. (2017). Teori Kekuasaan Michel Foucault. Jurnal Al-Khitabah, 3(1), 117–133.

Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2009). Is Transparency the Key to Reducing Corruption in Resource-Rich Countries? World Development, 37(3), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.07.002

Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2010). Transparency is not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption. International Political Science Review, 31(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110377602

Man-wai, T. K. (2006). Formulating an Effective Anti-Corruption Strategy – the Experience of Hongkong ICAC. In The Experience of Hong Kong ICAC (From Annual Report for 2005 and Resource Material Series No. 69.

Mardikantoro, H. B. (2014). Analisis Wacana Kritis pada Tajuk (Anti) Korupsi di Surat Kabar Berbahasa Indonesia. LITERA, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v13i2.2576

McLeod, R. H. (2008). Inadequate Budgets and Salaries as Instruments for Institutionalizing Public Sector Corruption in Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 16(2), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000008785260464

Mergel, I., Gong, Y., & Bertot, J. (2018). Agile Government: Systematic literature review and future research. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.003

Mietzner, M. (2015). Dysfunction by Design: Political Finance and Corruption in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 47(4), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2015.1079991

Najih, M., & Wiryani, F. (2020). Learning the Social Impact of Corruption: A Study of Legal Policy and Corruption Prevention in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(4).

Natalia, D. L. (2019). Media Massa dan Pemberitaan Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Antikorupsi Integritas, 05(2).

Peisakhin, L., & Pinto, P. (2010). Is transparency an effective anti-corruption strategy? Evidence from a field experiment in India. Regulation & Governance, 4(3), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01081.x

Pertiwi, K., & Ainsworth, S. (2021). “Democracy is the Cure?”: Evolving Constructions of Corruption in Indonesia 1994–2014. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(3), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04560-y

Peters, M. A. (2003). Truth-Telling as an Educational Practice of the Self: Foucault, Parrhesia and the Ethics of Subjectivity. Oxford Review of Education, 29(2), 207–223.

Prabowo, H., Hamdani, R., & Sanusi, Z. (2018). The New Face of People Power: An Exploratory Study on the Potential of Social Media for Combating Corruption in Indonesia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 12(3), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v12i3.3

Rahman, F. (2011). Korupsi di Tingkat Desa.

Ritzer, G. (2010). Teori Sosial Postmodern. Kreasi Wacana.

Ritzer, G., & Goodman, D. J. (2004). Teori Sosiologi Modern. Kencana.

Sarup, M. (1993). An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism. University of Georgia Press.

Sarup, M. (2011). Panduan Pengantar untuk Memahami Postrukturalisme & Posmodernisme. Jalasutra.

Schütte, S. A. (2007). The Fight against Corruption in Indonesia. Südostasien Aktuell : Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 26(4).

Scott, I., & Gong, T. (2015). Evidence-based policy-making for corruption prevention in Hong Kong: a bottom-up approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 37(2), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2015.1041222

Siddiquee, N. A. (2010). Approaches to fighting corruption and managing integrity in Malaysia: a critical perspective. JQ Political Institutions and Public Administration (Asia, Africa, Australia, Pacific Area, Etc.).

Steele, B. J. (2010). Of ‘witch’s brews’ and scholarly communities: the dangers and promise of academic parrhesia. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570903548170

Svensson, J. (2005). Eight Questions about Corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005774357860

Umar, H. (2013). Government Financial Management, Strategy for Preventing Corruption in Indonesia. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21002/seam.v5i1.1793

Waluyo, B. (2014). Optimalisasi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 1(2).

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020

Yeung, J. A. (2000). Fighting Corruption - The Hong Kong Experience. The Seminar on International Experiences on Good Governance and Fighting Corruption.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/mkd.v9i1.10750

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Abdul Gaffar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0