ADAPTING TO CHANGE: THE EXPERIENCES OF EFL TEACHERS WITH CURRICULUM REFORM

Syarifuddin Syarifuddin, Benni Ichsanda Rahman Hz

Abstract


In the realization of education, it is necessary to regularly update and revitalize the curriculum due to the dynamic nature of knowledge and evolving educational needs. This applies to the domain of teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL). However, the process of curriculum reform poses several challenges, particularly for teachers who play a vital role in its implementation. This research aims to explore the difficulties encountered by EFL teachers in adapting to the transition from the Curriculum 13 (K13) to the Kurikulum Merdeka (Independent Curriculum) in Indonesia. Through a phenomenological case study, three EFL teachers in the North Sumatra province share their perspectives and experiences in incorporating the new curriculum into their teaching practices. Despite facing essential obstacles such as limited access to ICT resources and inadequate training, the insights gathered underscore the importance of teachers cultivating creativity and adaptability in their teaching methods. Additionally, the study emphasizes the significance of a serious understanding of the subject matter and the integration of 21st-century skills. The diverse viewpoints presented offer current insights into addressing the challenges associated with the development and implementation of EFL at different levels and in various types of schools. 

Keywords


curriculum; EFL teachers; experiences

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adu, E. O., & Ngibe, N. C. (2014). Continuous change in curriculum: south africanteachers’

perceptions. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 983.

Ahmad, D. (2014). Understanding the 2013 curriculum of english teaching through the

teachers' and policymakers' perspectives. International Journal of Enhanced Research

in Educational Development (IJERED), 2(4), 6-15.

AlAmin, M., & Greenwood, J. (2018). The examination system in Bangladesh and its impact:

On curriculum, students, teachers and society. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1), 1-18.

Alfauzan, A. A., & Tarchouna, N. (2017). The role of an aligned curriculum design in the achievement of learning outcomes. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 4(3), 81-91.

Altbach, P. G., Berdahl, R. O., & Gumport, P. J. (Eds.). (2005). American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges. New York: JHU Press.

Aydin, H., Ozfidan, B., & Carothers, D. (2017). Meeting the challenges of curriculum and

instruction in school settings in the united states. Journal of Social Studies Education

Research, 8(3), 76-92.

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and

implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in

Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Broyles, I., Savidge, M., Schwalenberg-Leip, E., Thompson, K., Lee, R., & Sprafka, S. (2007). Stages of concern during curriculum change. Journal of the International Association of Medical Science Educators, 17(1), 14-26.

Cheung, A. C., & Man, W. P. (2012). Factors affecting the implementation of curriculum

reform in Hong Kong: Key findings from a large‐scale survey study. International

Journal of Educational Management, 26(1), 39-54.

Cone, C., Godwin, D., Salazar, K., Bond, R., Thompson, M., & Myers, O. (2016). Incorporation

of an explicit critical-thinking curriculum to improve pharmacy students’ critical-

thinking skills. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(3).

Endot, Z., Jamaluddin, R., Mohd Ayub, A. F., & Mohd Puad, M. H. (2021). Teacher readiness in implementing the teaching of design and technology and its relationship with self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 11(4S), 111122-111122.

Erstad, O., & Voogt, J. (2018). The twenty-first century curriculum: issues and challenges.

Springer International Handbooks of Education, 19-36. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_1

Gerrard, J., & Farrell, L. (2014). Remaking the professional teacher: authority and curriculum

reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(5), 634-655.

Gouëdard, P., Pont, B., Hyttinen, S., & Huang, P. (2020). Curriculum reform: A literature

review to support effective implementation. Washington: OECD Publishing.

Harris, R., & Graham, S. (2019). Engaging with curriculum reform: insights from English

history teachers’ willingness to support curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum

Studies, 51(1), 43-61.

Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools

and Tactics for Changing Your Organization and the World. New York: Harvard Business Press.

Hopmann, S. T. (2003). On the evaluation of curriculum reforms. Journal of Curriculum

Studies, 35(4), 459-478.

Inandi, Y., & Giliç, F. (2016). Relationship of teachers' readiness for change with their participation in decision making and school culture. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(8), 823-833.

Istiqomah, L. (2016). Dinamika perubahan kurikulum: Kebijakan perubahan kurikulum 2013

paud. Golden Age: Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 1(1), 39-52.

Jenkins, G. (2020). Teacher agency: the effects of active and passive responses to curriculum

change. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47, 167-181.

Jones, B., & Swanson, H. (2022). A framework for assessing teachers’ readiness for pedagogical transformation. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-ICLS 2022, pp. 1313-1316. International Society of the Learning Sciences.

Jorgenson, O. (2006). Why curriculum change is difficult and necessary. Independent School Magazine, 6(4), 66-79.

Kondakci, Y., Beycioglu, K., Sincar, M., & Ugurlu, C. T. (2017). Readiness of teachers for change in schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(2), 176-197.

Law, W. W. (2014). Understanding china’s curriculum reform for the 21st century. Journal of

Curriculum Studies, 46(3), 332-360.

Mcculloch, G. (2005). Curriculum reform, educational change and school improvement. The

practice and theory of school improvement: international handbook of educational

change, 169-181. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4452-6_9

Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn

from the experiences of others. Perspectives on medical education, 8, 90-97.

Nur, M. R., & Madkur, A. (2014). Teachers’ voices on the 2013 curriculum for

english instructional activities. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education),

(2), 119-134.

Pajarwati, D., Mardiah, H., Harahap, R. P., Siagian, R. O., & Ihsan, M. T. (2021). Curriculum

reform in indonesia: English education toward the global competitiveness. ETDC:

Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(1), 28-36.

Pak, K., Polikoff, M. S., Desimone, L. M., & Saldívar García, E. (2020). The adaptive challenges

of curriculum implementation: Insights for educational leaders driving standards-

based reform. AERA Open, 6(2), 2332858420932828.

Parsons, J., & Beauchamp, L. (2012). From knowledge to action: Shaping the future of

curriculum development in alberta. Alberta Education.

Priestley, M. (2011). Schools, teachers, and curriculum change: A balancing act?. Journal of

Educational Change, 12(1), 1-23.

Prihantoro, C. R. (2015). The perspective of curriculum in indonesia on environmental

education. International Journal of research studies in Education, 4(1), 77-83.

Qoyyimah, U. (2018). Policy implementation within the frame of school-based curriculum: a

comparison of public school and islamic private school teachers in east Java,

indonesia. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 48(4),

-589.

Riadi, A. (2019). An empirical studies on indonesian english-curriculum changes:

opportunities and constraints in an underdeveloped region. Indonesian TESOL

Journal, 1(2).

Schleicher, A. (2018). Educating learners for their future, not our past. ECNU Review of

Education, 1(1), 58-75.

Setiawan, B., & Suwandi, E. (2022). the development of indonesia national curriculum and

its changes: the integrated science curriculum development in indonesia. Journal of

Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(4), 528-535.

Suprapto, N., Prahani, B. K., & Cheng, T. H. (2021). Indonesian curriculum reform in policy

and local wisdom: perspectives from science education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA

Indonesia, 10(1), 69-80.

Tracey, B., Florian, K., & Marc, F. (2016). Educational research and innovation education governance in action lessons from case studies: Lessons from case studies. OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264262829-en

Tuffour, I. (2017). A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A

contemporary qualitative research approach. Journal of Healthcare Communications,

(4), 52.

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st

century competences: implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of

Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321.

Wahyuni, S. (2016). Curriculum development in indonesian context the historical perspectives and the implementation. Universum: Jurnal KeIslaman dan Kebudayaan,

(01), 73-82.

Wang, H., & Cheng, L. (2005). The impact of curriculum innovation on the cultures of

teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 7(4), 7-32.

Wang, Q. (2007). The national curriculum changes and their effects on english language

teaching in the people’s republic of china. International Handbook Of English

Language Teaching, 87-105.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v7i2.7887

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra 
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU), Medan
Jl. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Medan 20217
Telp. (061) 7869911, e-mail: language_literacy@sastra.uisu.ac.id