EXPLORING TEACHER–STUDENT TALK IN ENGLISH FOR YOUNG LEARNERS (EYL) LED BY A GEN Z TEACHER: A FIACS-BASED CASE STUDY IN INDONESIA

Arienta Eka Kurniawati, Hamamah Hamamah, Syariful Muttaqin

Abstract


Effective classroom interaction significantly contributes to successful English language learning among young learners. Despite extensive research on classroom interactions, the impact of Generation Z (Gen Z) teachers’ distinct communication traits remains underexplored, particularly within the Indonesian context. Drawing from social constructivism and digital pedagogy frameworks, this study addresses this gap by focusing on verbal interactions in an EYL setting in Indonesia. The research aims to explore how a Gen Z teacher’s communication style influences classroom interaction patterns and what pedagogical implications arise for student engagement, autonomy, and emotional development. A qualitative case study design was employed, involving one Gen Z teacher and 28 third-grade students at a private primary school in Indonesia. Data were collected over three 55-minute sessions using video recordings and coded through Flanders’ Interaction Analysis Categories System (FIACS). Reliability procedures and ethical consent were ensured prior to data collection. Findings show that direct talk such as asking questions (56.8%) and giving directions (41.5%), is more prevalent in Gen Z teacher interactions than indirect talk, like using student ideas (14%) and offering praise (15.11%). The emphasis on directive and questioning approaches limited the potential for fostering student autonomy and collaborative dialogue. Student responses were frequent (66.3%), indicating active engagement, yet minimal student-initiated talk suggests limited learner autonomy. The study suggests a need for professional development that encourages Gen Z teachers to balance directive communication with emotional support and digital integration. Enhancing these communicative strategies could improve student engagement, autonomy, and collaborative learning in EYL settings.

Keywords


Teacher Talk;Student Talk;Gen Z Teacher;FIACS;TEYL

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayunda, A., Komariah, E., & Achmad, D. (2021). An investigation of EFL classroom interaction by using Flanders Interaction Analysis Category System (FIACS). Research in English and Education Journal, 6(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.24815/read.v6i2.17326

Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson.

Cilliers, E. (2017). The challenge of teaching Generation Z. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences. http://hdl.handle.net/10453/158991

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Addison-Wesley.

Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (2007). Children's cognitive development and learning.

Harmer, J. (2008). How to teach English (Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 313–316). Oxford University Press.

Hikmawan, I., Damayanti, I. L., & Setyarini, S. (2023). Integrating traditional games into EFL speaking class: A case of English for young learners. Journal of English Language Studies, 8(2), 249–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jels.v8i2.19432

Kapoe, S. (2019). Analysis of classroom interaction using flander interaction analysis categories system (fiacs) in English class-unkriswina sumba. Journal of English Language Learning (JELL), 5(2), 142-148.

Khusnaini, N. (2019, November). The analysis of teacher talk and the characteristic of classroom interaction in English for young learner. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v8i2.32716

Köttl, H., Cohn-Schwartz, E., & Ayalon, L. (2021). Self-perceptions of aging and everyday ict engagement: A test of reciprocal associations. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(9), 1913–1922. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa168

Lipscombe, K., Buckley-Walker, K., & Tindall-Ford, S. (2023). Middle leaders’ facilitation of teacher learning in collaborative teams. School Leadership & Management, 43(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2023.2215803

Maisarah, et al. (2023). Teachers’ non-verbal communication in teaching English to young learners. Formosa Journal of Science and Technology, 2(8), 1939–1956. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v2i8.5325

Oktaviana, A.A. et al. (2024). Narrative cave art in Indonesia by 51.200 years ago. Nature. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07541-7

Okros, A. (2020). Harnessing the potential of digital post-millennials in the future workplace. Management for Professionals. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25726-2

Pinter, A. (2006). Verbal evidence of task related strategies: Child versus adult interactions. System, 34, 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.005

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843

Singh, Y. K., & Others. (2008). Educational technology: Teaching learning. A P H Publishing Corporation.

Suminar, A. R., Setiawati, P., Nurjamin, L. R., & Fajriah, Y. N. (2019). Indonesian EYL Curriculum Issues: Between Education Policy and Classroom Practices. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business, Law and Pedagogy, ICBLP (pp. 13-15). http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-2-2019.2286156

Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy--and completely unprepared for adulthood--and what that means for the rest of us. Simon and Schuster.

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.

Wedyawati, N., Seran, E. Y., Awang, I. S., & Kurniati, A. (2024). Microteaching calon guru sekolah dasar. Deepublish.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.3138/CJPE.BR-240




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v9i1.11027

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra 
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU), Medan
Jl. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Medan 20217
Telp. (061) 7869911, e-mail: language_literacy@sastra.uisu.ac.id