ENGLISH SUBJECT ON ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES (ESP) IN VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS

Fadlia Fadlia, Evi Zulida, Surya Asra, Rahmiati Rahmiati, Allif Syahputra Bania

Abstract


This study aimed to analyze the English subject in two vocational schools in Kota Langsa based on English for Specific Purposes (ESP) approach and how it was implemented in the classroom. This study applied a descriptive qualitative method. The two vocational schools involved in the research are Hotel Hospitality Management and Maritime Fishing Vessel Engineering. The data were gained from the teachers and students by conducting observation, interview, Focus Group Discusssion (FGD), and document analysis of syllabus and teaching materials. The data were analyzed by comparing the real condition of teaching-learning process and the ideal condition based on ESP approach. The finding showed that the two schools used General English (GE) frequently rather than ESP on English subject. Despite the common use of GE in these two schools, they had the option to adjust their English subject into ESP standard. One school had the ESP subject called English for Maritime and another school chose Mandarin subject as the option. As a result, the school only had GE for English subject. Thus, the English subject was taught and designed as English for General Purposes rather than English for Specific Purposes.


Keywords


English for Specific Purposes, ESP, Vocational School, English Subject, specific competences, General English

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anthony, L. (1997). ESP: What does it mean? Why is it different? On CUE. Retrieved from http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/abstracts/ESParticle.html

Bjork, C. (2005). Indonesia education: Teachers, schools, and central bureaucracy. London: Routledge.

Dudley-Evans, T. & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hutchinson T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511733031

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan [Kemdikbud]. (2008). Keputusan Direktur Jendral Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Retrieved from http://smk.kemdikbud.go.id/konten/473/spektrum-keahlian-pendidikan-menengah-kejuruan-

Kemdikbud. (2017). Strategi implementasi revitalisasi SMK melalui bilingual learning ecosystem untuk Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Retrieved from http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/5265/

Kemdikbud. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Biro Hukum dan Organisasi Kemdikbud. Retrieved from https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/arsip/Permendikbud_Tahun2014_Nomor60.pdf

Munby, J. (1988). A syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Poedjiastutie & Oliver. (2017). English learning needs of ESP learners: Exploring stakeholder perceptions at an Indonesian University. TEFLIN Journal, 28(1). https://journal.teflin.org/index.php/journal/article/view/421.

Poedjiastutie, D. (2017). The pedagogical challenges of English for specific purposes (ESP) teaching at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia, Educational Research Reviews. 12 (6), 338-349. doi:10.5897/ERR2016.3125

Sekneg. (2016). Intruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretaris Kabinet RI. Retrieved from http://kemdikbud.go.id › files › download

Schippers, U. & Patriana, D. M. (1994). Pendidikan kejuruan di Indonesia. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.

Widiati, U., Rohmah, Z., & Furaidah. (2016). Bahasa Inggris Kelas X. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Wright, C. (1992). The benefits of ESP. Cambridge: Cambridge Language Consultants.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v4i2.3064

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra 
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU), Medan
Jl. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Medan 20217
Telp. (061) 7869911, e-mail: language_literacy@sastra.uisu.ac.id