A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF A VINTAGE AMERICAN AIRLINES ADVERTISEMENT

Nathan John Dover

Abstract


Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a rapidly increasing area of study used by Applied Linguists to examine discourse, that is spoken or written communication, found in areas such as education, media and politics. CDA studies focus on the relationship between society and discourse and how the use of language reinforces already established societal roles. This paper focused on a vintage American Airlines advertisement of 1968 which is a classic example of utilitarian advertising that purported a false reality of air travel in the late 20th century. Using the three-dimensional CDA framework designed by Fairclough (1989) the results showed a manipulation of gender roles by the advertisers intended to appeal to the male dominated passengers of the airline. Primarily, the alignment of air hostess with that of a mother. The maternalisation of this profession reflected the advertisers’ views of the time and in a wider societal perspective, power inequalities between men and women.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andersson, H. & Schytt, E. (2017). Sexism in Advertising: A Qualitative Study of the Influence on Consumer Attitudes Towards Companies: Master Thesis in Business Administration. Retrieved from

https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1105334/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

Barthes, R. (1977) Rhetoric of the Image. Retrieved from http://huma1970a.blog.yorku.ca/files/2010/04/Barthes_Rhetoric-of-the-image.pdf.

Cook, G. (2001). Discourse in Advertising. London, England: Psychology Press.

Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London, UK: Longman.

Gee, J.P., & Handford, M. (2013). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. New York, U.S.A: Routledge.

Gill, R. (2008) Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising. Feminism and Psychology, 18(1), pp. 35-60. doi: 10.1177/0959353507084950.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996) The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(3), 491.

Goffman, Erving. (1978). Frame Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317800800108.

Hovland, R., McMahan, C., Lee, G., Hwang, J. S., & Kim, J. (2005). Gender Role Portrayals in American and Korean advertisements. Sex Roles, 53(11), 887-899.

Lawton, E. (2009) Gender Advertisements: Replication of a Classic Work Examining Women, Magazines and Facebook Photographs. Retrieved from www.core.ac.uk/download/pdf/56727887.pdf.

Mager, J., Helgeson, J.G. (2011). Fifty Years of Advertising Images: Some Changing Perspectives on Role Portrayals along with Enduring Consistencies. Sex Roles, 64, 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9782-6.

Pingree, et.al. (1976). A Scale for Sexism. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01958.x.

Williamson, J. (1978). Decoding Advertisements (Vol. 4). London, England: Marion Boyars

Tsichla, E. & Zotos, Y.C. (2014). Female Stereotypes in Print Advertising : a Retrospective Analysis. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 148, 446-454

Schindler, J.A. (1957). Woman’s Guide to Better Living 52 Weeks a Year. N.J., U.S.A: Prentice Hall Inc.

Smith, K. (2004). I Am Me, but Who Are You and What Are We : The Translation of Personal Pronouns and Possessive Determiners in Advertising Texts. Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mult.2004.013/html

Spock, B. (1946). The Common Sense Book of Baby and Child Care. New York City, U.S.A: Duell, Sloan and Pierce




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v5i1.3235

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra 
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU), Medan
Jl. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Medan 20217
Telp. (061) 7869911, e-mail: language_literacy@sastra.uisu.ac.id