DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING IN EFL PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ SLIDES: A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL MULTIMODAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Viville Irena Lola, Emi Emilia


Abstract


Presentation slides are highly incorporated in the classroom. However, the EFL pre-service teachers’ ability to compose meaning across different modes in presentation slides remains underexplored. This study investigates how a group of four EFL pre-service teachers designed presentation slides by analysing the visual, verbal, and gestural modes through the lens of Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis (SF-MDA). The research aims to examine how ideational, interpersonal, and textual meanings are realised in the multimodal artefacts, students’ design rationale, and how the three modes unite to achieve pedagogical goals, i.e. intersemiosis. The data included 15 presentation slides and an interview transcript, which provided insight into the EFL pre-service teachers’ design rationale. Findings indicate that although the slides employed the three modes, the analysis found limited intersemiosis, with modes, particularly the visual mode, not co-constructing meaning. This reflects a gap between the designers’ intention to engage students and the actual execution. The study concludes that pre-service teachers require not only theoretical exposure to multimodality but also structured practice in designing materials where meaning is distributed meaningfully across modes. These findings highlight the need for teacher education to develop curriculum that explicitly scaffolds digital multimodal composing skills.

Keywords


EFL pre-service teacher; Intersemiosis; Multimodality; Presentation slides; Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bock, Z. (2016). Multimodality, creativity and children’s meaning-making: Drawings, writings, imaginings. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 49(0). https://doi.org/10.5842/49-0-669

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Castelló, A., Chavez, D., & Cladellas, R. (2020). Association between slides-format and major’s contents: Effects on perceived attention and significant learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(33–34), 24969–24992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09170-4

Chen, C. W. Y. (2021). PowerPoint as a multimodal retelling tool: Students’ slide design, collaboration, and goal-setting. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1895801

Chen, Y., Weninger, C., & Lim, F. V. (2024). Multimodality: A systemic-functional semiotic perspective. In A. M. Riazi (Ed.), Less Frequently Used Research Methodologies in Applied Linguistics (Vol. 6, pp. 49–67). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge. https://techstyle.lmc.gatech.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/New-London-Group-2000.pdf

Dahlström, H. (2021). Students as digital multimodal text designers: A study of resources, affordances, and experiences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13171

Dai, Y., & Wu, Z. (2021). Developing multimodal communicative competence: Insights from “semantic gravity” and the Knowledge Process framework. System, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102561

Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2021). Multimodal Texts in Disciplinary Education. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63960-0

Demir, F. (2024). Examination of pre-service teachers’ experiences on student-centered instruction. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 14(1), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1363540

Eggins, Suzanne. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. Continuum.

Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing Functional Grammar. Pustaka Jaya.

Ghafar, Z. N. (2023). The teacher-centered and the student-centered: A comparison of two approaches. International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 1(1), 18–23.

Ghoushchi, S., Yazdani, H., Dowlatabadi, H., & Ahmadian, M. (2021). A multimodal discourse analysis of pictures in ELT textbooks: Modes of communication in focus. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 13(4), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.13.4.2

Gordani, Y., & Khajavi, Y. (2019). The impacts of multi-modal PowerPoint presentation on the EFL students’ content knowledge attainment and retention over time. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09979-z

Hafner, C. A., & Ho, W. Y. J. (2020). Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100710

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269

Hood, S. (2011). Body language in face-to-face teaching: A focus on textual and interpersonal meaning. In S. Dreyfus, S. Hood, & M. Stenglin (Eds.), Semiotic Margins (pp. 31–52). Continuum.

Humairoh, M. F. N., Widiati, U., Rabbianty, E. N., & Basthomi, Y. (2024). Pre-service English teachers’ beliefs about implementing digital multimodal composing in a teaching practicum context. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-04-2024-0201

Hung, H. T., Chiu, Y. C. J., & Yeh, H. C. (2012). Multimodal assessment of and for learning: A theory-driven design rubric. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01337.x

Jewitt, C. (2007). A multimodal perspective on textuality and contexts. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 15(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360701601937

Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing Multimodality. Routledge. www.routledge.com/cw/jewitt

Jones, P., Turney, A., Georgiou, H., & Nielsen, W. (2020). Assessing multimodal literacies in science: Semiotic and practical insights from pre-service teacher education. Language and Education, 34(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1720227

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading Images. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857

LeFebvre, L., Parsons, M., Entwistle, C., Boyd, R., & Allen, M. (2022). Rethinking PowerPoint slide design for multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(4), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221077628

León, S. P., & García-Martínez, I. (2021). Impact of the provision of PowerPoint slides on learning. Computers and Education, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104283

Lim, V. F. (2017). Analysing the teachers’ use of gestures in the classroom: A Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis approach. Social Semiotics, 29(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1412168

Lim, F. V. (2019). Investigating intersemiosis: A systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis of the relationship between language and gesture in classroom discourse. Visual Communication, 20(1), 34–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218820695

Lim, F. V., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2022). ‘If you have the freedom, you don’t need to even think hard’–Considerations in designing for student agency through digital multimodal composing in the language classroom. Language and Education, 37(4), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2107875

Lim, F. V., Toh, W., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2022). Multimodality in the English language classroom: A systematic review of literature. Linguistics and Education, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101048

Limbong, E., & Wadham, B. (2024). Exploring pre-service English teachers’ digital competence in creating interactive instructional materials. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(2), 748–767. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.35103

Lindenberg, D. (2022). Modes and intersemiotic cohesion in student presentations performed online: An SF-informed multimodal discourse analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 69, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.10.002

Lindenberg, D. (2023). Logico-semantic relations between spoken text and slides’ visual elements in student presentations conducted online in the English as a Foreign Language context. Visual Communication, 24(2), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572231180215

Liu, Y., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2009). Intersemiotic texture: Analyzing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics, 19(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330903361059

Lochmiller, C. (2021). Conducting thematic analysis with qualitative data. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2029–2044. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008

Magnusson, P., & Godhe, A. L. (2019). Multimodality in language education – Implications for teaching. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.127

Marissa, D. N., & Hamid, S. (2022). Bridging out-of-school digital literacy through multimodal composition for EFL students with developing proficiency. The JALT CALL Journal, 18(2), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v18n2.539

Martinec, R. (2000). Construction of identity in Michael Jackson’s Jam. Social Semiotics, 10(3), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330050136370

Narayanan, J., David, P., Naidu, M., Pallath, V., & Danaee, M. (2025). Emotional Design of PowerPoint Slides: Effect on Self-Perceptions of Mood, Cognitive Load and Memory Retention in Three Anatomy Lectures. Education in Medicine Journal, 17(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2025.17.1.9

Nisa, A. A., Dambaresya, Y., & Fauziah, S. N. (2021). Compositional meaning represented in Indonesian EFL learners PowerPoint slides: A multimodal viewpoint. TLEMC, 5(2). https://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/tlemc/article/view/3651/2031

O’Halloran, K. L. (2008). Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication, 7(4), 443–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357208096210

Pastini, N. W., & Lilasari, L. N. T. (2023). Empowering EFL students: A review of student-centred learning effectiveness and impact. Journal of Applied Studies in Language, 7(2), 246–259. http://ojs.pnb.ac.id/index.php/JASLhttp://ojs.pnb.ac.id/index.php/JASL

Rafelina, D. P., & Hermawan, B. (2022). The ideational meanings of multimodal texts presented in an EFL textbook. TLEMC, 6(2). https://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/tlemc/article/viewFile/5815/2434

Shin, D. S, Cimasko, T., & Yi, Y. (2020). Development of metalanguage for multimodal composing: A case study of an L2 writer’s design of multimedia texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100714

Singh, K. K. M., Leong, I. Y. C., & Vijayarajoo, A. R. (2024). Multimodality in academic oral presentations in the English language and discipline-based courses. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(3), 663–687. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i3.27866

Smith, B. E., Amgott, N., & Malova, I. (2021). “It made me think in a different way”: Bilingual students’ perspectives on multimodal composing in the English language arts classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 56(2), 525–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3064

Soraya, K. (2022). The implementation significant of images and texts in students’ Power Point slides. JEDLISH : Journal of Education and English Language Teaching, 2(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.61664/jedlish.v2i2.66

Syamdianita, S., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). The EFL pre-service teachers’ experiences and challenges in designing teaching materials using TPACK framework. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 561–577. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19202

Tang, K. H. D. (2023). Student-centered approach in teaching and learning: What does it really mean? Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.218

Tour, E., & Barnes, M. (2020). Engaging English language learners in digital multimodal composing: Pre-service teachers’ perspectives and experiences. Language and Education, 36(3), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1912083

Uzun, A. M., & Kilis, S. (2019). Impressions of pre-service teachers about use of PowerPoint slides by their instructors and its effects on their learning. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.547253

Veum, A., Siljan, H. H., & Maagerø, E. (2021). Who am I? How newly arrived immigrant students construct themselves through multimodal texts. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1788147

Widyaningrum, L., Fadhilah, rifatul, Sholihah, N., & Rochmawati, P. (2024). Shaping the way to teach? Exploring the adoption of digital multi-modal texts as instructional tools in EFL teaching practicum. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 18(2). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/lc

Wolfe, J., Shanmugaraj, N., Reineke, J., Caton Peet, L., & Moreau, C. P. (2024). Advancing the knowledge base on effective presentation slide design: Three pilot studies. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 54(3), 235–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816231169433

Yunus, M., Suciati, Ritonga, M., & Kumar, T. (2022). Multimodal teaching practices for EFL teacher education: An action based research study. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2022.13.01.016

Zayapragassarazan, Z., & Mohapatra, D. P. (2021). Effective learner engagement strategies in visual presentations. Journal of Education Technology in Health Sciences, 8(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jeths.2021.002

Zhang, M., Akoto, M., & Li, M. (2021). Digital multimodal composing in post-secondary L2 settings: a review of the empirical landscape. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 694–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1942068

Zhao, S., Djonov, E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2014). Semiotic technology and practice: A multimodal social semiotic approach to PowerPoint. Text and Talk, 34(3), 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0005

Zhao, S., & van Leeuwen, T. (2014). Understanding semiotic technology in university classrooms: A social semiotic approach to PowerPoint-assisted cultural studies lectures. Classroom Discourse, 5(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2013.859848

Zheng, Y. (2019). Meaning construction of multimodal discourse in high school English PPT courseware—A case study of the 10th national demonstration lectures for high school English teachers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(9), 1134–1139. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0909.01




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v1i1.11649

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.