T. S. ELIOT’S THE WASTE LAND THROUGH POSTMODERN LENS

Md Nurul Anwar, Md Nurul Ahad


Abstract


Conventional readings T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land interpreted it as a poem of utter cultural degeneration, spiritual collapse and mental disillusionment. Its dialectical mode of exchange and opposition between the past and the present invokes complicity to Hegelian dialectical approach that blends thesis (tradition), antithesis (disillusionment) — leading to an anticipation of a final synthesis as a ground of stability in truth and reality. However, the narrative structure of the poem remains resistant to any final synthesis, since the promise of the anticipated renewal does not materialize in any form of final resolution —a state that draws on the postmodern aporia of postponement of meaning supported by Derrida’s Deconstruction. This study thus contends that Eliot’s objective correlative and polyphonic voices support what Adorno (1973) calls “determinate negation of opposites”, thus framing a cultural decline of the present into self-awareness as opposed to the fragmented history of the past. By analyzing unresolved tensions within the poem, the study demonstrates how it enacts différance, positioning Eliot at a critical cusp of the postmodern epistemological departure.

Keywords


The Waste Land; Hegelian dialectic; objective correlative; negative dialectics; Postmodernism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adorno, T. W. (1973). Negative dialectics. New York, NY: Continuum.

Badiou, A. (2005). Being and event. London, UK: Continuum.

Beiser, F. C. (2005). Hegel. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203318670

Brooks, C. (1939). Modern poetry and the tradition. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

Byron, Donna K. (2003). Understanding referring expressions in situated language some challenges for real-world agents. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Language Understanding and Agents for Real World Interaction, pages 39–47

Davidson, H. (1985). T. S. Eliot and hermeneutics. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.

Derrida, J. (2016). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published in 1967). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850112

Eagleton, T. (1976). Marxism and literary criticism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Eliot, T. S. (1921). Tradition and the individual talent. In The sacred wood: Essays on poetry and criticism (pp. 42–53). London, UK: Methuen.

Eliot, T. S. (1922). The waste land. New York, NY: Boni and Liveright.

Ellmann, M. (1987). The poetics of impersonality: T. S. Eliot and Ezra Pound. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2016). Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating a Theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your "house". Administrative Issues Journal, 4(2), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.5929/2014.4.2.9

Gupta, S. (2023). Dialectical exhaustion and the post-war palimpsest. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192887563.001.0001

Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). The science of logic (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International. (Original work published 1812).

Hernández, J. (2019). Narratology and contradiction. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32575-1

Jameson, F. (1981). The political unconscious: Narrative as a socially symbolic act. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501741922

Kim, J. (2020). Rupture and transcendence in modernist poetry. Journal of Modern Literature, 44(2), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.2979/jmodelite.44.2.04

Levenson, M. H. (1984). A genealogy of modernism: A study of English literary doctrine 1908–1922. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Moretti, G. (2013). The bourgeois: Between history and literature. London, UK: Verso.

Ndlovu, S. (2018). The colonial unconscious. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108567890

Ohrvik, A. (2024). What is close reading? An exploration of a methodology. Rethinking History, 28, 238 - 260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2024.2345001.

Rabaté, J.-M. (2014). The crack of dawn: The revolution of 1916 and the ascent of modernism. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137424954

Rajbhandari, P., Smith, J., & Davis, A. (2023). Postmodern visions. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003312456

Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. New York, NY: Knopf.

Singh, A. (2021). Myth and modernity in The Waste Land. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300255642.001.0001

Smith, G. (1956). T. S. Eliot's poetry and plays: A study in sources and meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v1i1.12366

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.