DIGITAL PORTFOLIOS IN VOCATIONAL SPEAKING CLASSES: TEACHER’S PERCEPTIONS AND LESSON PLAN ANALYSIS

Mailiza Zainiza, Novia Trisanti


Abstract


Digital portfolios have become increasingly relevant in language education as tools for documenting learning processes, enabling multimodal task performance, and supporting formative assessment. However, limited research has examined how they are embedded in instructional planning or how teachers perceive their assessment role, especially in vocational English classrooms. This qualitative case study investigates (1) how digital portfolios are integrated into a speaking lesson plan, and (2) how a vocational English teacher perceives their use as an assessment tool. Data were collected through document analysis and an open-ended teacher questionnaire completed by an English teacher in an Indonesian vocational high school. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings show that digital portfolios were positioned as central to the design of speaking tasks, functioning as a structured mechanism for organizing workflow, documenting progress, and compiling multimodal evidence of learning. The teacher perceived the portfolio as a valuable tool for monitoring engagement, identifying learners who need support, and enhancing transparency in the learning process. However, constraints related to the absence of explicit assessment rubrics, increased workload, and varying student digital literacy limited the portfolio’s potential for systematic assessment of speaking skills. The study concludes that digital portfolios have strong potential as process-based assessment tools in vocational English instruction; however, their effectiveness depends on the availability of clear assessment criteria, technological readiness, and sustained institutional support.


Keywords


Digital Portfolios, Formative Assessment, Speaking Instruction, Vocational High School

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Abdullah, N., & Tan, H. R. (2024). Rubric-based evaluation in digital portfolio assessment: Enhancing reliability and transparency in EFL classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 31(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2280301

Barrett, H. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The reflect initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2

Barrett, H. (2010). Balancing the two faces of e-portfolios. Retrieved from http://electronicportfolios.org/balance/

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cakrawati, T. D., & Yosintha, R. (2025). Digital portfolios in English language teaching: A systematic review of trends, benefits, and future directions. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 9(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v9i1.2995

Chang, S. L., & Kabilan, M. K. (2022). Using social media as e-portfolios to support learning in higher education: A literature analysis. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09344-z

Chen, Y., & Huang, S. (2022). Students’ accountability and reflective engagement through digital speaking portfolios. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1782–1801. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Fang, W. (2022). Multimodal speaking portfolios in EFL classrooms: Expanding communicative competence through digital production. Language Learning & Technology, 26(3), 122–140. https://doi.org/10125/LLT-26-3-122

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Kusnadi, D., Suryani, N., & Prasetya, A. (2023). Digital media production tasks in vocational EFL settings: Authenticity, engagement, and multimodal literacy. Journal of Vocational Education Studies, 5(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1025/jves.2023.5.1.33

Lin, C. H., & Wen, L. (2023). Rethinking speaking assessment through multimodality: Insights from digital portfolio implementation. System, 118, 102984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.102984

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Nguyen, L., & Ikeda, M. (2021). Digital portfolios as tools for longitudinal learning documentation in EFL contexts. Innovations in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(4), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1879543

Rahimi, M., & Shute, V. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback in technology-enhanced speaking instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1675–1699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10012-5

Said, M., & Hashim, H. (2022). Digital literacy as a barrier and opportunity in e-portfolio implementation: Teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 18(2), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.48028/ijedict/ijedict.v18i2.911

Setyowati, R., & Husna, N. (2021). Promoting reflection and self-regulated learning through digital portfolios in Indonesian EFL classrooms. TEFLIN Journal, 32(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v32i1/115-134

Wang, Y., & Lee, J. (2020). Teacher workload and assessment challenges in digital portfolio environments. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 29(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.22318/jemh.2020.29.4.349

Xu, Q., Chen, S., Wang, J., & Suhadolc, S. (2021). Characteristics and effectiveness of teacher feedback on online Business English oral presentations in pandemic context. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00595-5

Yancey, K. B. (2023). The value of purposeful design: A case study of an e-portfolio reflective prompt. Across the Disciplines, 20(3–4), 31–49.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v9i2.12584

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.