EVALUATION ON LANGUAGE ATTITUDE OF PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES IN THE DISCOURSE OF DEBAT CAPRES 2019: APPRAISAL ANALYSIS

Dian Marisha Putri

Abstract


General Election in 2019 is considered as the biggest party in democracy; it was used as the source of data from the third and the fourth segment on March 30, 2019. They were then transcribed and analyzed by using appraisal pattern study based on three analyses: engagement, attitude, and graduation in the appraisal pattern attitude. The result of the research in DC discourse consisted of engagement, attitude, and graduation. The attitude pattern of the presidential candidates comes from personality and the ‘order’ of political parties. Negative attitude is conveyed in the forms of expressions in dissatisfaction, injustice, greed, ambition, moral messages, noble values, and generosity. The function of presidential candidate debate is in the series of democratic system. Positive attitude identified in the Presidential Debate discourse through the utterances of Presidential Candidate 1 and Presidential Candidate 2 was analyzed through their implicit and explicit expressions such as a) acting in the firm way, b) acting hesitatingly, c) patience, and optimistic, and d) attitude toward gender.

Keywords


Appraisal. Presidential Candidate Debate, Attitude

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berg, Bruce L. (1989). Qualitative Research Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Bungin, B. (2007). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana.

Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis Wacana. Malang: LkiS.

Egginz, Suzanne. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter Publisher

Fairlough, Norman. (2003). Language and Power: Relasi Bahasa, Kekuasaan dan Ideologi. THE MESSENGER, Volume III, Nomor 1, Edisi Juli 2011 35

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

Martin, J. R. (1992). ENGLISH TEXT System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Martin, J. R and Rose, David. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.

Miles, M. B and Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Translation

Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI PRESS

Moleong, Lexy J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Revised Ed. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Ratna, Nyoman Kutha. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kajian Budaya dan Ilmu Sosial Humaniora Pada Umumnya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Sinar, Tengku Silvana. (2010). ”Upaya penelitian dalam Merawat Kearifan Lokal.” Harian Analisa Medan 7 Februari 2010.

Sunarto. (1991). Debat Capres Purwa Gaya Yogyakarta, Sebuah Tinjauan tentang Bentuk, Ukiran, Sunggingan, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Spradley, James P. (1980). Doing Participants Observation. Participants’ Observation. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v4i1.1678

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra 
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU), Medan
Jl. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Medan 20217
Telp. (061) 7869911, e-mail: language_literacy@sastra.uisu.ac.id