SHE, ROBOT: MALE CHARACTERS’ MECHANISATION OF OPHELIA IN SHAKESPEARE’S HAMLET

Zanyar Faiq Saeed

Abstract


This paper entitled “She, Robot: Male Characters’ Mechanisation of Ophelia in Shakespeare’s Hamlet” is an attempt to explain how Ophelia is deprived of her subjectivity and objectified into a machine-like being that cannot think, speak, and act independently. The agents of this mechanisation are three male characters, namely, Laertes, Polonius and Hamlet respectively. The paper traces the mechanisation process by expounding how each one of the male characters, thinking himself superior, commanding and abusing Ophelia until she turns into a broken machine. This may be considered as one of the major reasons behind her mental breakdown and, ultimately, her supposed suicide. The organisation of the text is based on the successive roles of each of the above-mentioned male characters in the process of turning Ophelia into a machine, i.e., a robotic character. The paper delineates the situation of renaissance women under a male-dominated society and highlights the danger of exerting too much pressure on people to a degree that may lead to untoward consequences.


Keywords


Laertes, Machine, Mechanisation, Objectification, Ophelia, Polonius, Robot, Shakespeare’s Hamlet

Full Text:

PDF

References


Assiter, Alison. (1996). Enlightened Women: Modernist Feminism in a Postmodern Age. London, Routledge.

Bienias, Barbara. (2011). Virgins or Whores? The Image of a Renaissance Woman in Parlour Games in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Othello, in Acta Philologica 39 by Wydział Neofilologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

Blake, N. F. (2004) Shakespeare’s Non-Standard English: A Dictionary of His Informal Language. Continuum.

Boobani, Farzad. (2006). The Story of O: An Exponential Analysis of Ophelia’s Role in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Year 49, No. 198.

Bostrom, Melissa. (1996) Women in Madness: Ophelia and Lady Macbeth. Articulāte: Vol. 1 , Article 6.Available at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/articulate/vol1/iss1/6

Bradley, A. C. (1992). Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures On Hamlet, Othello, King Lear Macbeth. New York, Macmillan Education.

Chen, Yi-Chi. (2011). Pregnant with Madness—Ophelia’s Struggle and Madness in Hamlet. Intergrams 11.2: http://benz.nchu.edu.tw/~intergrams/intergrams/112/112-cyc.pdf ISSN: 1683-4186.

Foss, Sonja K et al. (1999). Feminist Rhetorical Theories. London, Sage Publication.

Grimmett, Roxanne (2005). By Heaven and Hell’: Re-evaluating Representations of Women and the Angel/Whore Dichotomy in Renaissance Revenge Tragedy. Journal of International Women's Studies, 6(3), 31-39. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol6/iss3/4

Günenç, Mesut. (2015, December). Ophelia And Gertrude: Victimized Women In Hamlet. The Journal of International Social Research Volume: 8 Issue: 41,. www.sosyalarastirmalar.com ISSN: 1307-9581.

Karapandza, Asja. (2014). Beloved Ophelia or "Love Too Thick" Woman's language in Shakespeare and Morrison". CUNY Academic Works. http://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_etds_theses/238

Khan, Qaisar and Bughio, Faraz Ali. (2012). Nunnery Scene: A Pragmatic Analysis of Hamlet-Ophelia Encounter. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies – Vol 18(2): 25 – 34.

Kuhlman, Ericka. (2002). A to Z of Women in World History. New York, Facts on File.

Lifton, Robert Jay. (1989). Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: a study of ‘brainwashing’ in China. North Carolina, North Carolina University Press.

Olivas, Tynelle Ann. (2015). Who is Ophelia? An examination of the Objectification and Subjectivity of Shakespeare's Ophelia. UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 2403. http://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/2403

Rials, Emily. (2008). “What We May Be”: Definition of the Self in Castiglione and Shakespeare, in The Boothe PRIZE ESSAYS. Stanford University: VPUE.

Shakespeare, William. (2003). Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, Ed. Philip Edwards. Cambridge and New York: The New Cambridge Shakespeare.

Smith, Barbara. (2008, spring). “Neither Accident nor Intent: contextualizing the Suicide of Ophelia”. South Atlantic Review, Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 96-112 by South Atlantic Modern Language Association.

Stokes, Lisa. (1992). “Who’s There?”: Deconstructed Selves in Hamlet and Ophelia. Nature, Society and Thought: A Journal of Dialectical and Historical Materialism, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 69-96.

Walizer, Marue E. (1987, February). Adolescent Experience as Shakespearean Drama. The English Journal, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 41-43. By National Council of Teachers of English

Wilcockson, Colin. (1991). Father-directors, daughter-performers in Shakespeare. Critical Survey, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 134-141. Published by Berghahn Books.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v5i2.4449

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra 
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU), Medan
Jl. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Medan 20217
Telp. (061) 7869911, e-mail: language_literacy@sastra.uisu.ac.id