HIGH-PROFICIENCY AND LOW-PROFICIENCY LEARNERS’ COMPENSATION STRATEGIES USE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING

Tania Tahmina

Abstract


Compensation strategies are vital for foreign language learners to overcome difficulties in acquiring a second language. According to Oxford (1990), these strategies help learners “overcome knowledge limitations in all four skills” (p. 90), making them essential for effective language acquisition. This study investigates the preferred compensation strategies of high- and low-proficiency English learners at Jagannath University, Dhaka, Bangladesh, using a mixed-methods approach. Data collection involved the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) questionnaire designed by Oxford, alongside semi-structured interviews to enrich the qualitative findings. Results indicate distinct preferences based on proficiency levels: high-proficiency learners frequently employed Strategy 6: “If I can’t think of an SL word, I use a word or phrase that means the same thing” (40%). Meanwhile, low-proficiency learners favored Strategy 1: “To understand unfamiliar SL words, I make guesses” (66.66%). These findings highlight the significance of adapting teaching approaches to address diverse learner needs, ultimately enhancing language learning efficiency and effectiveness.


Keywords


Compensation Strategies, High-proficiency Learners, Low-Proficiency Learners, Language Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmada, B. S., & Ismailb, R. (2012). Compensation learning strategies employed by adult ESL learners of a university in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 78–87.

Burrow, J., Dooley, M., Wright, T., & DeClou, L. (2012). A report on the postsecondary decisions of high-achieving students in Ontario. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.

Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14–26.

Dornyei, Z., & Scott, M. L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47(1), 173–210.

Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.

Karbalaei, A., & Taji, T. N. (2018). Compensation strategies: Tracking movement in EFL learners’ speaking skills. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 9, 88–102.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House Publishers.

Pasumbu, H. A., & Macora, Y. D. (2018). Compensation as a strategy in teaching reading to EFL junior high school students. SintuwumarosoJET, 4(1), 39–42.

Ragab, M. F. M., El-Marsafy, A. H., & Abdu-Allah, A. M. (2021). The effectiveness of compensation strategies for developing some media translation skills for educational media students at the Faculty of Specific Education. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(4), 4371–4380.

Sahib, S. M. A. (2016). Compensation strategies used by EFL learners in speaking and listening skills. Journal of University of Thi-Qar, 11(1), 31–43.

Syafryadin, S., Martina, F., & Salniwati. (2020). Compensation strategies in speaking activities for non-English department students: Poor and competent speakers. Journal of English Education Society, 5(2), 109–116.

Taheri, A. A., & Davoudi, M. (2016). The use of compensation strategies in the Iranian EFL learners’ speaking and its relationship with their foreign language proficiency. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 165–179.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v8i2.8766

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.