IDEOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTION IN GEN Z’S SLANG ON INSTAGRAM: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
Abstract
This research aims to examine textual features, investigate discursive practices, and analyze social practices that reveal the ideological constructions embedded in Gen Z’s slang on Instagram, utilizing Norman Fairclough’s three-dimensional model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). Data were obtained from 31 purposively selected public Instagram posts that contained frequently used slang expressions, such as "delulu," "roasting," and "rizz." The analysis was conducted through three interrelated stages: textual analysis (examining linguistic patterns, metaphors, and emojis), discursive practice analysis (exploring production, circulation, and audience interpretation), and social practice analysis (interpreting the broader ideological context). Findings reveal that Gen Z’s slang reflects ideologies of individualism, irony, authenticity, and digital resistance, functioning not only as a linguistic trend but also as a discursive tool for negotiating power and identity in online communication. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how language and ideology intersect within contemporary digital discourse, highlighting the socio-cultural significance of youth language in shaping online interactions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adhi, I. M., & Masykuroh, Q. (2025). Sociolinguistic analysis of Gen Alpha’s slang in YouTube Shorts comments of meme content creators. JELITA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature, 6(1), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.56185/jelita.v6i1.920
Eviani, E. (2021). Ideologi akun Instagram @Tahilalats: Analisis wacana kritis Instagram account ideology @Tahilalats: Analysis of critical discussion. [Unpublished manuscript].
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman
Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. (Eds.). (2013). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Routledge.
Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
Paoletti, V. D. (2025). Youth language uncovered: Meta-synthetic insights into Gen Z and Gen Alpha slang. Journal of Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 9–16.
Paula M., Siregar, M. B. N., Fathiha Malika Shakira, L., Lailan Haz, & Rahmadsyah Rangkuti. (2024). Sociolinguistic study: Variation of slang words between Gen Z and Gen Alpha. Philosophica: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 7(2), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.35473/pho.v7i2.3545
Roth‐Gordon, J. (2020). Language and creativity: Slang. In the International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 1–8). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0192
Shifman, L. (2021). Memes in digital culture (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Silverman, D. (2020). Interpreting qualitative data (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Snee, H., Hine, C., Morey, Y., Roberts, S., & Watson, H. (Eds.). (2016). Digital methods for social science: an interdisciplinary guide to research innovation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Syaputra, A. R., Sari, S., & Endang, A. (2024). The use of slang language style on social media Instagram by Gen Z (Generation Z). Journal of English Linguistics and Literature, 1(2), 147–152.
Telaumbanua, Y. A., Elvin, N., Zendrato, C., Nias, U., Nazara, B. T., Nias, U., & Harefa, E. C. (2024). Analyzing the language style of generation Z teenagers in their Instagram posts. JELITA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature, 5(2), 588–600. https://doi.org/https://doi.or g/10.56185/jelita.v5i2.790
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908
Wafa, Z., & Amalia, P. D. (2022). An analysis of slang words used for comments on Instagram. JournEEL: Journal of English Education and Literature, 2(1), 60–69.
Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to discourse analysis (pp. 38–53). Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748680801-025
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v9i2.12165
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.











