INTERPERSONAL METAFUNCTION IN BIRTHDAY AND CONDOLENCE MESSAGES: A COMPARATIVE REGISTER ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL DISCOURSE

Sanka Washew, Daniel Dwamena Ofosu, Andrews Kwame Osei


Abstract


This study applies Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to compare interpersonal meanings in birthday and condolence messages. The study focuses on mood, modality, and pronoun use to examine how language constructs and sustains social relationships in celebratory versus grief contexts. A descriptive qualitative research design was used to gather and analyse data, consisting of 250 birthdays and 250 condolences messages from online message sources. Data were annotated with the UAM Corpus Tool, 6.2, to identify the interpersonal features of the texts. Results indicate that both registers are dominated by a declarative mood, but they differ in orientation. Birthday messages emphasised positive affect through certainty, possibility, and intention, while condolence messages use greater syntactic complexity, deontic modality, and third-person pronouns to acknowledge loss and express sympathy. The study advances an SFL-based register of short-form digital discourse and reveals how linguistic choices encode empathy, solidarity, and emotional alignments in contextually contrasting, yet relationally intimate genres. This study contributes to register analysis in digital discourse by highlighting interpersonal metafunctions in contrasting genres.

Keywords


birthday messages; condolence messages; interpersonal metafunction; modality; mood; pronouns; Systemic Functional Linguistics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Absattar, A., Mambetova, M., & Zhubay, O. (2022). The potential of emotive language to influence the understanding of textual information in media coverage. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01232-2

Afreh, E. S., & Ofosu, D. D. (2024). The Language of Grief: The Role of Conceptual Metaphors in Family Tributes of Ghanaian Funeral Ceremonies. Cognitive Semantics, 10(2), 253–282. https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10064

Ajayi, T. M., & Akinrinlola, T. (2024). The pragmeme of accommodation in Christian condolence messages in Nigeria. Pragmatics and Society, 14(1), 322–347. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21098.aja

Allan, K. (2020). Linguistics and Communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 17(3), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-3002

Amphaeris, J., Blumstein, D. T., Shannon, G., Tenbrink, T., & Arik Kershenbaum. (2023). A multifaceted framework to establish the presence of meaning in non‐human communication. Biological Reviews, 98. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12989

Armstrong, E., & Ferguson, A. (2010). Language, meaning, context, and functional communication. Aphasiology, 24(4), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902775157

Ateca-Amestoy, V., & Prieto-Rodríguez, J. (2023). Whether live or online, participation is unequal: Exploring inequality in the cultural participation patterns in the United States. American Behavioral Scientist, 68(11). https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231177655

Bentum, M., ten Bosch, L., van den Bosch, A., & Ernestus, M. (2022). Speech register influences listeners’ word expectations. Brain and Language, 235, 105197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105197

Bhattacharjee, A., Pang, J., Liu, A., Mariakakis, A., & Williams, J. J. (2023). Design implications for one-way text messaging services that support psychological well-being. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3569888

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021). Grammar of spoken and written English. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.232

Bottomley, J. S., Smigelsky, M. A., Floyd, R. G., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2017). Closeness and conflict with the deceased. Omega. Journal of Death and Dying, 79(4), 377–393.

Bowcher, W. L. (2021). Context of situation and the role of language. Functions of Language, 28(3), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20014.bow

Briones, R. R. Y. (2016). Textual analysis through systemic functional linguistics. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v1i2.27

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Chandra, O. H. (2019). Happy birthday: Form and function of language. Culturalistics: Journal of Cultural, Literary, and Linguistic Studies, 3(2), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.14710/culturalistics.v3i2.6722

Chen, X., & Brown, L. (2024). L2 pragmatic development in constructing and negotiating contextual meanings. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amae049

Cheng, S. (2023). A review of interpersonal metafunction studies in systemic functional linguistics (2012–2022). Journal of World Languages, https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2023-0026

Cheung, L. M. E. (2021). Expressions of modality associate degree business explanation essay conclusions: A functional linguistic perspective. English Language Teaching, 15(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n1p92

Chueasuai, P. (2017). The interpersonal metafunction and translation of power relations: A case study of Fifty Shades of Grey. MANUSYA, 20(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-02003001

Coplan, R. J., McVarnock, A., Hipson, W. E., & Bowker, J. C. (2022). Alone with my phone? Examining beliefs about solitude and technology use in adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(6), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254221113460

Dąbrowska, M. (2019). Birthday, culture, and social media. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 15(2 (20)), 86–122. https://doi.org/10.46991/AFA/2019.15.2.086

Dobson, R., Whittaker, R., Abroms, L. C., Bramley, D., Free, C., McRobbie, H., Stowell, M., & Rodgers, A. (2024). Don’t forget the humble text message: 25 years of text messaging in health. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e59888–e59888. https://doi.org/10.2196/59888

Duku, B. I., Broohm, O. N., & ResCue, E. (2024). Exploring the semantic and pragmatic functions of modal auxiliaries: A case study of commencement speeches. Legon Journal of the Humanities, 35(1), 192–226. https://doi.org/10.4314/ljh.v35i1.6

Egbert, J., & Gracheva, M. (2022). Linguistic variation within registers: granularity in textual units and situational parameters. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2022-0034

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Hadi, H. ur R., & Guo, X. (2020). An interpersonal metafunction analysis of President Mohammad Ashraf Ghani‘s speech at the 72nd Session of the United Nations General Assembly. Regular Issue, 4(5), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijmh.d0451.014520

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar (1st ed.). Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edition. Taylor And Francis.

Hartati, E. (2015). The realization of interpersonal negotiation in the conversation. JELE (Journal of English Language and Education), 1(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.26486/jele.v1i2.166

Herman, H., Purba, R., Sijabat, P. A., Saputra, N., Muhammadiah, M., & Thao, N. V. (2022). Investigating the realization of speech function in a speech through systemic functional linguistics perspective. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 7(01), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v7i01.917

Holmes, J., & Wilson, N. (2022). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367821852

Ijam, D. M. M., & Al-Ameedi, R. T. K. (2024). A systemic functional linguistic analysis of mood and modality in one of Metcalfe’s novels. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(5), 1360–1370. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1405.08

Imre, A. (2017). A logical approach to modal verbs 1 can and could. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 9(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1515/ausp-2017-0022

Jarmużek, T., & Klonowski, M. (2020). On logic of strictly-deontic modalities. a semantic and tableau approach. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 29(1), 335–380. https://doi.org/10.12775/llp.2020.010

Liimatta, A. (2023). Register variation across text lengths evidence from social media. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 28(2), 202–231. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20177.lii

Lin, S. S.-H., & Walden, A. (2023). Ageism in birthday cards: A mixed-method content analysis. Gerontologist, 64(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnad115

Liping, C. (2017). Analysing interpersonal metafunction through personal pronouns in song Ci Jiang Cheng Zi. Ji Meng. Studies in English Language Teaching, 5(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v5n1p71

Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2023). Committing and evading: Truth, modality and hedging. In How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction (pp. 2–45). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036212933

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture (Reprint, p. 289). Equinox Publication.

Nouri, A. A., & Hussein, O. A. (2023). Text messaging in English and Arabic with reference to translation. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 6(3), 595–602. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i3.28121

O’Donnell, M. (2008). The UAM Corpus Tool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration. In C. M. B. Callejas, J. F. F. Sánchez, J. R. I. Ibáñez, M. E. G. Sánchez, E. C. de los Ríos, S. S. Ramiro, S. C. Martínez, N. P. Honeyman, & B. C. Márquez (Eds.), Applied Linguistics Now: Understanding Language and Mind (pp. 1433–1447). Universidad de Almería.

Ofosu, D. D., Gyimah Manu, J., & Freitas, P. K. (2023). I-You indexicals in Ghanaian church music. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(2), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6767

Okafor, A. Y. (2022). Address terms used for birthday wishes: A case of students and lecturers of Nwafor Orizu College of Education, Nsugbe. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 4(4), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v4i4.340

Olia, A. (2024, January 30). Text message statistics & trends for 2024 [And Beyond!]. Intradyn. https://www.intradyn.com/text-message-statistics-trends/

Olson, D. R., Antonietti, A., Liverta-Sempio, O., & Marchetti, A. (2006). The mental verbs in different conceptual domains and in different cultures. In A. Antonietti, O. Liverta-Sempio, & A. Marchetti (Eds.), Theory of Mind and Language in Developmental Contexts (pp. 31–64). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b106493

Sánchez, M. Á. C. (2021). From the metafunctions of language to the hyperfunctions. The new multimodal reality of hypertext. International Journal of Transmedia Literacy (IJTL), 2. https://doi.org/10.7358/ijtl-2016-002-celi

Schaebbicke, K., Seeliger, H., & Repp, S. (2021). The diverse landscape of negative polarity items: On the use of German NPIs as experimental diagnostics. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(6), 1461–1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09793-0

Slipetska, V., Bortun, K., Zhylin, M., Horlachova, V., & Kosharnyi, K. (2023). Structure and semantics of verbal means of expressing states of emotional tension in English publicistic texts. Revista Amazonía Investiga, 12(67), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2023.67.07.19

Soria, S., Gutiérrez-Colón, M., & Frumuselu, A. D. (2020). Feedback and mobile instant messaging: Using WhatsApp as a feedback tool in EFL. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 797–812. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13151a

Suleman, N., Sadiq, U., & Siddiqui, S. (2021). The impact of technology upon formal communication: Texting impacting the standard English. Journal of Business & Tourism, 4(1), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.34260/jbt.v4i1.105

Thi Ngu, D. (2023). Language communication functions. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 4(6), 607–611. https://doi.org/10.54660/.ijmrge.2023.4.6.607-611

Tseronis, A., & Forceville, C. (2017). Multimodal argumentation and rhetoric in media genres. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Van Linden, A. (2012). Modal adjectives English deontic and evaluative constructions in diachrony and synchrony. De Gruyter.

Viebahn, E. (2018). Ways of using words: On semantic intentions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 100(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12526

Yuryeva, Y. B. (2019). Address form as a reflection of ethno-cultural style of communication (based on British and Canadian English). RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 10(2), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2019-10-2-532-543

Zeng, Z., & Wang, J. (2019). A comparative study of interpersonal function in political speeches: A case study of inaugural speeches by Theresa May and David Cameron. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(3), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0903.08

Zhang, J. (2019). A semantic approach to the English modality. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 879. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1004.28




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v10i1.12805

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.