REPRESENTING SOCIAL RELATIONS THROUGH ADDRESS TERMS IN ZOOTOPIA

Syifa Zahra, Muhammad Hafiz Kurniawan


Abstract


This study investigates how terms of address in Disney’s Zootopia represent social relations, particularly unequal power relations and interpersonal closeness. Terms of address in conversation reflect various aspects of social relationships, including power relations, social distance, frequency of interaction, and emotional closeness. Employing a qualitative discourse analysis approach, the study analyzes address terms used by characters in both formal and informal interactions throughout the film. The study addresses two research questions: (1) How do terms of address reveal unequal power relations in formal settings? And (2) How do terms of address reveal interpersonal closeness in informal situations? The analysis integrates Eggins’ theory of tenor within the interpersonal metafunction framework and van Leeuwen’s theory of social actor representation. The findings reveal that formal interactions are predominantly characterized by formalization (71.4%) and honorification (87%), indicating the influence of institutional hierarchy and social distance on language choice. In contrast, informal interactions are dominated by appraisement (55.7%) and informalization (68.4%), reflecting familiarity, emotional closeness, and frequent social contact among characters. The findings demonstrate that address terms function not only as linguistic markers of identity but also as indicators of social hierarchy and interpersonal relationships. However, since this study focuses solely on a single animated film as a representation of social relations, future studies are encouraged to compare address-term usage across different films, genres, or cultural contexts.

Keywords


Terms of address; Discourse analysis; Social Actor; Zootopia

References


Adams, M. (2009). Power, politeness, and the pragmatics of nicknames. NAMES: A Journal of Onomastics, 57(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1179/175622709X436369.

Anderson, E. (2017). Private government. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/ 9781400887781.

Andries, F. A., Walalangi, D. G., Posumah, J., Iroth, S., Tulus, A., & Lengkoan, F. (2025). Language in cinema: A pragmatic study of violation contexts in Disney’s Animated Film Zootopia. REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 7(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.31849/9b49rq25.

Batubara, A. S., Nasution, S. N., & Pratama, D. R. (2020). Deconstruction of leading characters in Zootopia movie script. CaLLs: Journal of Culture Arts Literature and Linguistics, 6(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.30872/calls.v6i2.2331.

Beaudine, G., Osibodu, O., & Beavers, A. (2017). Disney’s metaphorical exploration of racism and stereotypes: A review of Zootopia. Comparative Education Review. 61(1), 227-234. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:151555971.

Bezemer, J., & Jewitt, C. (2010). Multimodal analysis: Key issues. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 180–197). Continuum. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284081419_Multimodal_analysis_Key_issues.

Bowser, B. P. (2017). Racism: Origin and theory. Journal of black studies, 48(6), 572-590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934717702135.

Brooks, R. R. (2025). Laws of address: The impact of the practice and words of address on our civil, political, and social lives. Houston Law Review., 62, 743. Retrieved from: https://houstonlawreview.org/article/137778-laws-of-address-the-impact-of-the-practice-and-words-of-address-on-our-civil-political-and-social-lives.

Budiarta, I. W., & Gaho, R. (2021). Deixis analysis on Zootopia movie script: A pragmatic study. IJOLTL (Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics), 6(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.30957/ijoltl.v6i3.682.

Chew, K. (2019). On war and cuteness: The utopian politics of Disney’s Zootopia. Screen, 60(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjz043.

Choudhry, A., & Chaudhary, F. (2020). Shattering conventional gender roles: Transitivity analysis of Disney’s Zootopia. Journal of Languages, Culture and Civilization, 2(4), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.47067/jlcc.v2i4.28.

Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. Continuum.

Elman, J. P. (2022). Slothful movements: Disability, acceleration, and capacity feminism in Disney’s Zootopia. Feminist Media Studies, 22(4), 914–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1855223.

Fritz, A. M. (2020). “Buy everything”: The model consumer-citizen of Disney’s Zootopia. Journal of Children and Media, 14(4), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1725901.

Gee, J. P. (2025). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and Method (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003535935.

Holmes, J. & WIlson, N. (2022) An introduction to sociolinguistics (6th ed.). Taylor and Francis.

Ivchenko, N. (2021). Comic function in the animated ecodiscourse (case study of Zootopia). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(9), 1080–1086. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1109.14.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox Publishing Ltd.

Mikos, L. (2018). Collecting media data: TV and film studies. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection (pp. 412–425). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Murdiyanti, A. P., & Prastiwi, Y. (2025). Representation of discrimination in the animated movie “Zootopia” (2016): John Fiske’s Semiotic Analysis. TRANS-KATA: Journal of Language, Literature, Culture and Education, 5(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.54923/jllce.v5i2.155.

Naovaratthanakorn, P., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2019). An analysis of women’s language and social ideologies: A case study of an animated movie Zootopia. Thoughts, 2, 1–35. Retrieved from: https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/article/view/178878.

Rarasati, I., & Zanawi, M. (2024). Critical discourse analysis on representation of Arab Spring in the Movie Alephia 2053. Lingua Cultura, 18(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v18i1.10743.

Sandlin, J., & Snaza, N. (2018). It is called a hustle, sweetheart: Black Lives Matter, the police state, and the politics of colonizing anger in Zootopia. The Journal of Popular Culture, 51(5), 1190-1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12747.

Simajuntak, N., & Damanik, B. A. R. (2025). The semantics review on the analysis of idioms in Zootopia film. Sindoro: Cendikia Pendidikan, 16(8), 111–120. Retrieved from: https://cibangsa.com/index.php/sindoro/article/view/3693.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.

Van Wietmarschen, H. (2022). What is social hierarchy?. Noûs, 56(4), 920-939. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12387.

Wardana, I. A., & Fauziati, E. (2025). Linguistic identity and social roles in the film Green Book. Linguistics and ELT Journal, 13(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v13i1.31077.

Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An introduction to sociolinguistics (6th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Wardaugh, R., & Fuller, J.M. (2014). An introduction to sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Zhou, F., Mou, J., He, M., & Kim, J. (2021). Nicknames as identity badges: How self-reflective nicknames can facilitate users’ online social interactions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60(102459), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102459.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v10i1.13485

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.