WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK PRACTICES IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS IN GHANA

Dorah Mensah, Charles Owu-Ewie, Levina Nyameye Abunya, Albert Abban


Abstract


This paper examines the practice of written error correction from different perspectives in real classroom contexts. Although a plethora of research has been done in different contexts, the subject is least exploited in Ghana, especially in senior High school contexts. This paper reports on a qualitative study of written corrective feedback practices in three Senior High schools in Ghana. Drawing on Schmidt’s noticing hypothesis and Swain’s comprehensive output hypothesis models, the study aims to determine whether teachers’ written error corrections effectively direct students towards ‘noticing’ the gaps in their written ‘output’, thereby resulting in higher degrees of learnability. A sample size of 824 students was selected from five common course areas using a systematic random sampling strategy, while a purposive sampling strategy was used to select nine English language teachers who had at least three years of continuous experience from the three schools. The findings of the study indicate that teachers have positive beliefs about the potency of written error corrections in the development of language. However, variances in the choice of strategies, practices of teachers, and preferences of students result in the provision of non-targeted feedback which affects revision and learnability. This study recommends that teachers should collaborate with learners to provide more targeted corrections which would result in enhanced ‘noticing’ and improved learnability of the English language among Ghanaian students.

Keywords


Written corrective feedback; Positive, Strategies; Written error corrections; Feedback; Approaches

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adjei, D., N. (2019). The use and effect of smartphones in students’ learning activities: Evidence from the university of ghana, legon. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), Article No. 2851.

Aluf, D. S. (2024). Written corrective feedback: senior high school students’ perceptions and preferences. Journal education and development, 12(1), 250-257.

Alkhatib, N. (2015). Written corrective feedback at a Saudi university: English language teachers’ beliefs, students’ preferences, and teachers’ practices. Phd Thesis: University of Essex.

Allwright, D. (2006). Six promising directions in applied linguistics. In Understanding the language classroom (pp. 11-17). London: Springer.

Ataman, D. S., & Mirici, I. H. (2017). Contribution of corrective feedback to english language learners' writing skills development through workfolio based tasks. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 9(1), 1-30.

Ayele, A. (2019). The practices of english language teachers’ error treatment on students’ writing: the case of secondary school teachers in benishangul gumz regional state, ethiopia. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies. 7(11) (Nov. 2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2019/v7/i11/HS1910-037.

Bergh, L., V. & Douwe, B. (2012). Teacher feedback during active learning: Current practices in primary schools. British Journal of Education Psychology. 83(2), 341-362 https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02073.x

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of second language writing, 17(2), 102-118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Burt, M. K. & Dulay, H.C. (1975). A new approach to discovering universals of child second language acquisition. In D. Dato (Ed.), Developmental psycholinguistics (monograph series on language and linguistics) (pp. 209-33). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of second language writing, (12), 267-296.

Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of b.f. skinner’s verbal behavior. Language. 35, 26-58

Chomsky, N. (1985). The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Springer

Chunrao, D., Xiang, W., Shuyang, L., Wenhui, X., & Qin, X. (2022). The effects of coded focused and unfocused corrective feedback on esl student writing accuracy. Journal of Language and Education, 4 (32), 36-57.

Corder, S.P. 1982. Error analysis and interlanguage. London: Oxford University Press.

Ducken, D. (2014). Written corrective feedback in the L2 classroom. Master Thesis. Washington: Eastern Washington University

Duff, C. (2012). Exploring the role of ‘enabling places’ in promoting recovery from mental illness: A qualitative test of a relational model. Health & place. Elsevier, 18(6), 1388-1395.

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054

Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 155–182.

Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81–104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Ferris, D. R. (2007). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. Journal of second language writing (16), 165-193.

Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in sla intersections and practical applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ganapathy, M. N. G, Lin, D. T. A. & Phan, J. (2020). Students' perceptions of teachers' written corrective feedback in the malaysian esl classroom. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 103-136.

Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross‐Feldman, L. (2005). Task‐based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language learning, 55(4), 575-611.

Hopper, D., & Bowen, N. (2023). Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about written corrective feedback: perspectives on amount, type, and focus of feedback in an EFL Setting. Reflections, 30(3), 735-756.

Irwin, B. (2017). Written Corrective Feedback: Student Preferences and Teacher Feedback Practices. Journal of Language Learning, 3(2), 1-24

Jacobsen, M., Friesen, S., & Brown, B. (2018). Teachers' professional learning focused on designs for early learners and technology. In Innovative Practices in Teacher Preparation and Graduate-Level Teacher Education Programs (pp. 417-438). IGI Global.

Kepner, C. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 305-313.

Khanlarzadeh, M., & Taheri, P. (2017). L2 Writing Teachers' perceptions and problems regarding written corrective feedback: does holding a tefl degree matter? European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 6(1), pp. 130-145.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input hypothesis. New York: Longman.

Kutnick, P., & Jules, V. (1993). Pupils' perceptions of a good teacher: A developmental perspective from Trinidad and Tobago. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(3), 400-413.

Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of hong kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 285–312.

Lee, M. D. P. (2008). A Review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00226.x

Lee, I. (2019). Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2019 52(4), 524 - 536

Mashaan, N. (2020). The Role of feedback in teaching and learning: An overview conference. International Multidisciplinary Conference on Education, Management, and Technology. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Mensah, P. A., 2021, Green product awareness effect on green purchase intentions of university students’: an emerging market’s perspective. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 1-13.

Merrill, S. (1985). 1985: Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass, & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 235-252). Newbury House.

Mollestam, E., & Hu, L. (2016). Corrective Feedback on L2 Students’ Writing. Faculty of Education and Society: Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Myles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. Tesl-ej, 6(2), 1-20.

Owusu, E. (2019). Corrective feedback and its effects on memoranda and letters of students of sunyani technical university in ghana. The international journal of humanities & social studies, 7(4).

Owusu, E. (2020). The effects of direct and indirect written corrective feedbacks on the business communication texts of technical university students in ghana. Applied linguistics Research Journal, 4(2).

Rastgou, A. (2022). How feedback conditions broaden or constrain knowledge and perceptions about improvement in L2 writing: A 12-week exploratory study. Assessing Writing, 53, 100633.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.

Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: a tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning, 9, 1-64.

Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 593-610). Routledge.

Soleimani, N., & Rahimi, M. (2021). (Mis) alignment of iranian efl teacher’s written corrective feedback beliefs and practices from an activity theory perspective. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1901640.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Input in second language acquisition, 15, 165-179.

Thonus, T. (2002). Tutor and student assessments of academic writing tutorials: What is “success”?. Assessing Writing.8(2), 110-134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1075293503000023

Truscott, J. (1996b). The case against grammar correction in l2 writing classes. Language learning (46), 327-369.

Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of second language writing, 16(4), 255-272.

Wei, W. & Yiqian (Katherine), C. (2020). Written corrective feedback strategies employed by university english lecturers: a teacher cognition perspective, SAGE Open, 10(3).

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics an introductory analysis. 2nd Edition, New York: Harper and Row.

Yang, L., Zhang, L., Li, C., Wang, K., Fan, L., & Yu, R. (2021). Investigating efl teachers' beliefs and practices about written corrective feedback: a large-scale study. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 25, 29-65.

Yunus, W. N. M. W. M. (2020). Written corrective feedback in english compositions: Teachers' practices and students' expectations. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 95-107.

Zhang, L. J., & Cheng, X. (2021). Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ linguistic performance: A mixed-methods study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101043




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v8i1.9259

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.