WHITEWASHING HEATHCLIFF: RACIAL ERASURE IN WUTHERING HEIGHTS ADAPTATIONS (2011, 2026)

Nasywa Salsabila Putri, Zulidyana Dwi Runalsari


Abstract


This study examines the whitewashing of Heathcliff in film adaptations of Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights and argues that such practices constitute a form of structural racial erasure. Drawing on Critical Race Theory (CRT), adaptation theory, close reading, and Visual Discourse Analysis (VDA), the study investigates how Heathcliff’s racial identity is constructed in the novel and represented in the 2011 and 2026 film adaptations. Film adaptations play a crucial role in shaping public interpretations of literary texts, yet they often reproduce dominant racial ideologies through casting practices. The findings reveal that Heathcliff’s racial otherness is central to the narrative, shaping his experiences of exclusion, marginalization, and revenge. A review of adaptation history demonstrates a persistent pattern of whitewashing, with Andrea Arnold’s 2011 adaptation serving as a notable exception through its casting of a Black actor as Heathcliff. Comparative visual analysis further shows that the 2011 adaptation foregrounds Heathcliff’s racial identity through casting and cinematographic techniques, whereas Emerald Fennell’s 2026 adaptation minimizes racial difference and reconstructs Heathcliff as a racially unmarked romantic hero. The study concludes that the repeated erasure of Heathcliff’s racial identity reflects broader structural inequalities within the film industry and significantly alters the cultural interpretation of Brontë’s novel. By integrating CRT, close reading, and VDA, this research contributes to adaptation studies and media representation scholarship by demonstrating how racial erasure operates across literary adaptations and reinforces dominant racial narratives within contemporary visual culture.

Keywords


Racism; Miscasting; Mischaracterization; Movie adaptation; Perfect casting; Wuthering Heights

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abraham, D. (2024). From page to screen: How media adaptations reframe classic literature for contemporary audiences. A Multidisciplinary Journal 3(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.22034/mic.2024.486421.1026.

AlDahoul, N., Ibrahim, H., Park, M., Rahwan, T., & Zaki, Y. (2024). Inclusive content reduces racial and gender biases, yet non-inclusive content dominates popular culture. arXivLabs 1–2, 1–86. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.06404.

Bhopal, K. (2023). critical race theory: Confronting, challenging, and rethinking white privilege. Annual Review of Sociology, 49(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-123710.

Brown, W., & Zuo, M. (2025). Introduction: Critical race theory and film-philosophy. Film-Philosophy, 29(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3366/film.2025.0306.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Pz5RvgAACAAJ.

Culler, J. D. (2007). The literary in theory. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=wmxwT746DucC

Delgado, R., Stefancic, J., & Harris, A. (2017). Critical race theory (Third Edition): An introduction. NYU Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=FH_bDQAAQBAJ

Diko, M., & Saule, N. (2024). Adapting a novel for television: A systemic critique. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity, 19(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2024.2389274.

Dowie-Chin, T., Cowley, M. P. S., & Worlds, M. (2020). Whitewashing through film: How educators can use critical race media literacy to analyze hollywood’s adaptation of Angie Thomas’ the hate u give. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 22(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v22i2.2457.

Hutcheon, L., & O’Flynn, S. (2013). A theory of adaptation. Routledge. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=PRPReTQ2cYgC.

Lawrence, S., & Hylton, K. (2022). Critical race theory, methodology, and semiotics: The analytical utility of a “race” conscious approach for visual qualitative research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 22(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086221081829.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=2oA9aWlNeooC.

Meyer, S. (1996). Imperialism at home: Race and Victorian women’s fiction. Cornell University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=etTVpbQaqHwC.

Michie, E. B. (1993). Outside the pale: Cultural exclusion, gender difference, and the victorian woman writer. Cornell University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=1CXuAAAAMAAJ.

Ohrvik, A. (2024). What is close reading? An exploration of a methodology. Rethinking History, 28(2), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2024.2345001.

Rose, G. (2014). Visual culture, photography and the urban: An interpretive framework. Space and Culture, India, 2(3), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v2i3.92.

Schmitt, C. (1997). Alien nation: Nineteenth-century gothic fictions and English nationality. University of Pennsylvania Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv4s7gvk.

Sere, Shinta Andriani, Muarifudin, Amalia, Fina, & Shinta Sere; Muarifuddin Muarifuddin; Fina Amalia Masri. (2020). The Representation of African cultural identity in black panther film by ryan coogler (the application of stuart hall’s theory). ELITE: Journal of English Language and Literature, 5(1), Page 1-13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33772/elite.v3i1.876.

Stam, R. (2004). Literature through film: Realism, magic, and the art of adaptation. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=NUC2EAAAQBAJ.

Thalken, R., Mimno, D., & Wilkens, M. (2024). It matters to the viewer: social reviews of books adapted for film. Digital Studies / Le Champ Numérique, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.9671.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v10i1.13478

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.